All posts by Greg

Retired with my wife Reenie in Vilcabamba Ecuador

Dr.SHIVA LIVE: WHY the #DeepState Created the #CoronaVirus SCAM. Real Economy vs. Fake Economy. – YouTube

Dr.SHIVA LIVE: Why the #DeepState Created the #CoronaVirus SCAM. Real Economy vs. Fake Economy. Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, the Inventor of Email, Scientist, Inventor, US Senate Candidate (R-MA) provides a systems analysis of WHY the #DeepState created the #CoronaVirus SCAM. Learn about the REAL Economy versus the FAKE Economy.

It’s the economy not the virus

Real Economy = Truth, Freedom and Health

Fake Economy = Power, Profit and Control

Watch: Illinois Explains What Qualifies as a ‘COVID Death’



This is how Covid 19 deaths are officially counted and verified by the hospitals, are we stupid to still be in a lock down?

AP featured image

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker speaks at a state Capitol news conference Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2019, in Springfield, Ill., as state Treasurer Michael Frerichs looks on. The Democratic Illinois state officials are offering $100 million in low-interest or interest-free loans to federal workers going without paychecks during a record 33-day government shutdown. (AP Photo/John O’Connor)

What counts as a death from the Wuhan coronavirus?

One would think someone who died from the virus, right? That would be logical.

But not so much.

It appears to depend on where you are. So, for example, let’s hear from the folks in Illinois what they are counting as a “COVID” death.

Here’s Illinois’ Public Health Director Dr. Ngozi Ezike saying people are listed as a coronavirus death even if they died of alternative causes. “Even if you died of a clear alternate cause but you had COVID at the same time it’s still listed as a COVID death.”

“Even if you died of a clear alternate cause but you had COVID at the same time it’s still listed as a COVID death.”

Illinois’ Public Health Director Dr. Ngozi Ezike says people are listed as a coronavirus death even if they died of alternative causes.

She notes, for example, if a man was in a hospice and was given weeks to live and happened to catch it, but die from the underlying condition, he would be counted as a “COVID” death.

There are also reports that the new bill included money for hospitals for virus patients. So, it seems to pay to list someone as a virus patient.

Mandatory Vaccines? The Supreme Court Said Yes! But Wait, There’s

Source: Mandatory Vaccines? The Supreme Court Said Yes! But Wait, There’s

If there is one topic that even comes close to the amount of coverage the virus gets, it is vaccines, and the big question is will they be mandatory?
Recently Jason goodman of Crowd Source The Truth interviewed Alan Dershowitz and Dershowitz made some very bold controversial statements… Dershowitz, a high profile lawyer who has formerly represented president President Trump, OJ Simpson and even Jeffery Epstein amongst other high profile clients, stated you have no constitutional protectuon against being forcibly vaccinated for an infectious disease. Lets take a closer look…

WHO Started This Pandemic: “As A Training Exercise”

William Mount

The WHO planing for the Covid 19 pandemic exercise started in September 2019.

A World at Risk : Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies – Global Preparedness Monitoring Board [EN/AR/RU/ZH]

Then in October 2019 an actual dry run of the effects of the pandemic were rehearsed.

Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Highlights Reel

Selected moments from the Event 201 pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated the pandemic preparedness efforts needed to diminish the large-scale economic and societal consequences of a severe pandemic. Drawing from actual events, Event 201 identifies important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the audience. For more information, visit: http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.or…

EVENT 201: Coronavirus crisis is ushering in a new world order — and it was all planned out LAST fall.

You May Be Exempt From Wearing a Face Mask – LewRockwell

Source: You May Be Exempt From Wearing a Face Mask – LewRockwell

Face masks are being turned to as a largely superstitious solution to the concerns about coronavirus, as opposed to a solution driven by data. The data also indicates that their use comes with drawbacks.

That being the case, local orders requiring a face mask are likely to make clear that there are exemptions to the order.

San Francisco Department of Public Health has played a leading role in Northern California, nationally, and globally in shaping corona response policy. That official order along with directives from City Hall deserve further attention, as it makes notable exceptions to who must wear the mask.

It Is Dangerous For Children Under 2 To Wear A Face Mask

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is a poorly explained phenomena that frightens parents. Corona prevention or not, any artificial obstruction of a child’s breathing goes against years of warning on this topic and flies in the face of the fact that some children do appear to stop breathing.

The San Francisco face mask directives state “Children under 2 years old must not wear a face covering. They may suffocate.”

Children Under 12 Must Be Supervised, And The Order Will Not Be Enforced For Them

The same caution around little ones up to the age of 12 is expressed in the San Francisco directives.

“Children 3 to 12 years old are not required to wear a face covering. If they do, they should be supervised by an adult. Supervision may look different based on the age and maturity of the child. For some children, having a discussion may be enough.  For younger children, parents and caretakers should be present during use by the child. Parents and caregivers should use their judgement.”

The mayor of San Francisco has advised that this order will not be enforced for children up to and including the age of 12.

If You Have Documentation From A Doctor Then You Don’t Have To Wear One 

Understandably, enforcement of the order is made easier if those with an exemption can show medical documentation. The San Francisco face mask order States: “If you have documentation showing a medical professional has told you not to wear a face covering, you do not have to wear one.”

But that poses a problem because many doctors offices have been shuttered. It is very difficult to get in to visit with a doctor. Therefore, the order also includes those who do not have a note from a doctor.


The Difficulty Of Breathing In Face Masks Are Well Established 

I know it’s frustrating to have to jump through these hoops just to go grocery shopping without wearing a mask that makes it difficult to breathe, dangerously difficult for some.

In 2018, Yolo County, California posted cautionary advice about face masks before the wearing of face masks became so politicized in spring 2020:

“N95 respirators can make it more difficult for the wearer to breathe due to carbon dioxide build up, which reduces the intake of oxygen, increased breathing rates and heart rates…N95 use may lead to increased heart rate, respiratory rate, work of breathing, carbon dioxide buildup in micro-ambient air and heat stress — potentially posing risk to sensitive populations.”

A 2010 study of ten healthcare workers in Respiratory Care, a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal, placed study participants on a treadmill for an hour showing  that even with an exhalation vent, the carbon dioxide levels in an N-95 mask become far higher than would be allowed in a safe workplace and the oxygen levels far lower.

On April 23, 2020, a driver in Lincoln Park, New Jersey lost consciousness, careened off the road, and crashed into a pole. Police found no signs of drug or alcohol use and believe that the accident was caused by driving in an N-95 face mask for several hours.

Face masks aren’t a cure-all and come with some meaningful downsides, especially for at-risk populations.

In fact, it’s worth noting that face masks don’t filter out small particles. A 2016 study of dental uses of face masks points this out. Face masks can be useful for preventing direct, immediate contamination of a surface from a person who is coughing and sneezing, but the fine-particle aerosolized portion of matter is still transmitted.

With so little benefit, it’s actually pretty crazy to wear a face mask. And it’s definitely crazy to elevate it to a moral standard as some people are doing.  The puritanical American roots have turned on those who dare step outside with a full, unexposed face, just as they turned on the “witches” at Salem, in a period of mass hysteria that will be forever remembered as a dark point in the American experiment.

There’s great symbolism to saying you will or will not wear the face mask. Some go so far as to call them fear masks.

But there is also another practical factor involved: it may be a burden for you and you may be legitimately exempt from wearing it while society figures out if an executive should have the authority to make these sweeping orders. You are, after all, the only person whose actions you are able to control.

If a face mask presents a health burden to you, look at the written policy of your face mask order, identify health or other exemptions, and establish clear boundaries around your wearing of that face mask.

You will be better off for having defended your own boundaries and your own well-being. And though this additional benefit may not be in your own self-interest, you will have helped others who have a similar hesitation around masks defend their health and safety, by merely defending your own boundaries on this matter.

Not only can courage be contagious. It can be benevolent as well.

COVID-19 HIPAA Face Mask Exemption ‘Passes’

South Philly judge of elections admits he took bribes to stuff the ballot box for Democratic candidates

South Philly judge of elections admits he took bribes to stuff the ballot box for Democratic candidates

Source: South Philly judge of elections admits he took bribes to stuff the ballot box for Democratic candidates

The Justice Department on Thursday announced charges against a Philadelphia election official for “fraudulently” stuffing ballot boxes to help Democrat candidates in the 2014, 2015, and 2016 elections.
Domenick J. DeMuro, 73, of Philadelphia, PA, a former Judge of Elections for the 39th Ward, 36th Division in South Philadelphia, has been charged and has pled guilty to a two-count Information charging (1) conspiracy to deprive Philadelphia voters of their civil rights by fraudulently stuffing the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates in the 2014, 2015, and 2016 elections, and (2) a violation of the Travel Act, which forbids the use of any facility in interstate commerce (here, a cell phone) with the intent to promote certain illegal activity (here, bribery), US Attorney William M. McSwain announced on Thursday.
DeMuro admitted in his guilty plea that he was actually paid by an unnamed political consultant to illegally add votes for certain Democrat candidates.
DeMuro received between $300 to $5,000 per election from the political consultant under the guise of “consulting fees” in exchange for adding fraudulent votes on the voting machines — also known as “ringing up” votes.
“DeMuro fraudulently stuffed the ballot box by literally standing in a voting booth and voting over and over, as fast as he could, while he thought the coast was clear. This is utterly reprehensible conduct. The charges announced today do not erase what he did, but they do ensure that he is held to account for those actions,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.
“This defendant abused his office by engaging in election fraud for profit,” said Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “Today’s conviction makes it clear that the Department of Justice will do all in its power to protect the integrity of elections and maintain public confidence in all levels of elected government.”
How could this be? The Democrat-media complex tells us that voter fraud is just a right-wing conspiracy theory.

[BREAKING VIDEO REPORT] $660 Million Spent on 30+ Field Hospitals, Most Had ZERO Patients – YouTube Newsletter%3A Will COVID-19 Public Policies Split Up Families%3F (RUVPVY)&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJlc3Rlcmx1bmR0cm95QHlhaG9vLmNvbSIsICJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIksydlhBeSJ9

Sayer Ji reports on a new NPR investigation which reveals that despite $660 million in federal spending to set up 30+ field hospitals for the anticipated catastrophic case load from COVID-19, most of the emergency field hospitals had ZERO patients. 

The implications of this NPR report are profound, revealing that the dominant mainstream narrative about COVID-19’s catastrophic burden on the US healthcare system never materialized. As reported on May 7th, 2020,

“As hospitals were overrun by coronavirus patients in other parts of the world, the Army Corps of Engineers mobilized in the U.S., hiring private contractors to build emergency field hospitals around the country.

The endeavor cost more than $660 million, according to an NPR analysis of federal spending records.

But nearly four months into the pandemic, most of these facilities haven’t treated a single patient.”

The statistics reveal a striking contrast between the official narrative of hospitals overrun with patients and bodies piling up and the reality of how overblown the crisis was from the beginning.