{"id":12202,"date":"2021-11-29T04:20:26","date_gmt":"2021-11-29T09:20:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/?p=12202"},"modified":"2021-11-29T04:20:26","modified_gmt":"2021-11-29T09:20:26","slug":"appeals-court-re-affirms-pause-on-biden-workplace-vaccine-mandate-cites-severe-risk-vizarer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/appeals-court-re-affirms-pause-on-biden-workplace-vaccine-mandate-cites-severe-risk-vizarer\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeals court re-affirms &#8216;PAUSE&#8217; on Biden workplace vaccine mandate, cites &#8216;SEVERE RISK&#8217; &#8211; VIZARER"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/vizarer.com\/appeals-court-re-affirms-pause-on-biden-workplace-vaccine-mandate-cites-severe-risk2159-2\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-1.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Source: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/vizarer.com\/appeals-court-re-affirms-pause-on-biden-workplace-vaccine-mandate-cites-severe-risk2159-2\/\">Appeals court re-affirms &#8216;PAUSE&#8217; on Biden workplace vaccine mandate, cites &#8216;SEVERE RISK&#8217; &#8211; VIZARER<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<header class=\"entry-header\">\n<div class=\"entry-meta\"><span class=\"posted-on\"><i class=\"fa fa-calendar\"><\/i><span class=\"date-label\">\u00a0<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vizarer.com\/appeals-court-re-affirms-pause-on-biden-workplace-vaccine-mandate-cites-severe-risk2159-2\/\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date published\" datetime=\"2021-11-13T09:45:27+01:00\">November 13, 2021<\/time><\/a><\/span><span class=\"byline\"><i class=\"fa fa-user\"><\/i><span class=\"author-label\">By\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"author vcard\"><a class=\"url fn n\" href=\"https:\/\/vizarer.com\/author\/primesigma\/\">primesigma<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"entry-content clearfix\">\n<div id=\"vizar-712857358\" class=\"vizar-before-content\"><\/div>\n<p>A federal appeals court re-asserts the indefinite stall on Biden covid mandate on Friday which forces workers to get the vaccine or risk losing their jobs. The re-assertion of the vaccine follows a legal challenge from a coalition of states led by Texas.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"jetpack-lazy-image jetpack-lazy-image--handled\" src=\"http:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Biden-Build-Back-better.jpg\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" data-lazy-loaded=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u201ctake no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further court order.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The 5th circuit Appeals court ordered OSHA to halt any action until further court order. The ruling is the latest development in what is expected to be a very long court battle over the \u201clegality of the mandate\u201d.<\/p>\n<div id=\"vizar-1324871153\" class=\"vizar-content\"><\/div>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"jetpack-lazy-image jetpack-lazy-image--handled\" src=\"http:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/gettyimages-1149120392.jpg\" alt=\"After endorsing him this summer, former President Donald Trump is hosting a high-priced fundraiser for Texas attorney general Ken Paxton's reelection campaign in December.\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" data-lazy-loaded=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Ken Paxton, Texas attorney general and vocal critic of Biden took to Twitter to air his approval of the court ruling.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Paxton wrote:<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>\u201cCiting Texas\u2019s \u201ccompelling argument[s],\u201d the 5th Circuit has delayed OSHA\u2019s unconstitutional and illegal private-business vaccine mandate. WE WON! Litigation will continue, but this is a massive victory for Texas and FREEDOM from Biden\u2019s tyranny and lawlessness,\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>The Fifth Circuit has allowed a stall on enforcement of the Biden Administration mandate on Nov. 6, 24 hours after the directive was made public. in its ruling on Friday, the court said \u201cthe mandate exposes [suers] to severe financial risk\u201d and \u201cthreatens to decimate their workforces (and business prospects).\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>The public reacted positively to the court ruling<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>\u201c*Awesome*, *awesome*. Hopefully, it will get bound up in the court(s) so long the virus will be gone and the order will be rendered moot.\u201d<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>\u201cThe foundation for the OSHA rule entirely relies on the idea the virus places the employees in \u201cgrave danger.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cA few problems are easily identified here\u2026<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>1) The vast majority and percentage of individuals who easily recover from the virus don\u2019t support this claim. The survival and recovery rate simply doesn\u2019t support the basis and foundation for establishing the OSHA rule.<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>2) Similarly, it cannot be said the virus only places employers with more than 100 employees in \u201cgrave danger\u201d and somehow it doesn\u2019t affect employers with less than that at all.<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>3) OSHA is required by law to protect all employers and all employees from occupational harm. They cannot engage in \u201cselective enforcement\u201d activities which is what this mandate is doing.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u201cAlso vaccinated people can still catch COVID and transmit the virus to others. So they are a danger to others too not just the unvaccinated. What I have researched indicates the vaccinated has a higher viral load and are super spreaders.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u201cHas anyone, Republican or Democrat, suggested that being vaccinated be a requirement for getting government assistance, i.e., welfare? Why not? If workers are threatened with losing their paychecks, shouldn\u2019t welfare recipients be threatened with losing their welfare checks?\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u201cHey, how bout a requirement that all those who enter this country illegally get vaccinated or deported on the spot? Oh never mind,\u2026that\u2019s too much common sense for one day.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u201cNow that\u2019s an outstanding idea!! However, they are not making any of the illegal aliens to get vaccinated so highly unlikely.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u201cWhy do presidents get to make laws without being vetted for constitutionality? Executive orders need to be constitutional \u2018before\u2019 they\u2019re enacted.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled\">\n<div class=\"robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\"><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Appeals court re-affirms &#8216;PAUSE&#8217; on Biden workplace vaccine mandate, cites &#8216;SEVERE RISK&#8217; &#8211; VIZARER \u00a0November 13, 2021By\u00a0primesigma A federal appeals court re-asserts the indefinite stall on Biden covid mandate on Friday which forces workers to get the vaccine or risk losing their jobs. The re-assertion of the vaccine follows a legal challenge from a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/appeals-court-re-affirms-pause-on-biden-workplace-vaccine-mandate-cites-severe-risk-vizarer\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Appeals court re-affirms &#8216;PAUSE&#8217; on Biden workplace vaccine mandate, cites &#8216;SEVERE RISK&#8217; &#8211; VIZARER<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,53,37,29],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12202"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12202"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12206,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12202\/revisions\/12206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}