{"id":1336,"date":"2017-05-27T07:30:19","date_gmt":"2017-05-27T12:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/?p=1336"},"modified":"2017-05-27T07:30:19","modified_gmt":"2017-05-27T12:30:19","slug":"breaking-10-federal-judges-demand-americans-surrender-to-islam-whats-your-response-youtube","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/breaking-10-federal-judges-demand-americans-surrender-to-islam-whats-your-response-youtube\/","title":{"rendered":"BREAKING: 10 Federal Judges DEMAND Americans Surrender to Islam, What\u2019s Your Response? &#8211; YouTube"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"474\" height=\"267\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/dDuQTN_zgbc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<div id=\"watch-uploader-info\"><strong class=\"watch-time-text\">Published on May 26, 2017<\/strong><\/div>\n<div id=\"watch-description-text\" class=\"\">\n<p id=\"eow-description\" class=\"\">BREAKING: 10 Federal Judges DEMAND Americans Surrender to Islam, What\u2019s Your Response?<\/p>\n<p>Check The My New Channel : <a class=\"yt-uix-servicelink  \" href=\"https:\/\/goo.gl\/pAHH18\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-servicelink=\"CC8Q6TgYACITCLqZw-OGkNQCFdVDvgodXuYJjij4HQ\" data-target-new-window=\"True\" data-url=\"https:\/\/goo.gl\/pAHH18\">https:\/\/goo.gl\/pAHH18<\/a><br \/>\nPlease Subscribe: <a class=\"yt-uix-servicelink  \" href=\"https:\/\/goo.gl\/J8aMKx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-servicelink=\"CC8Q6TgYACITCLqZw-OGkNQCFdVDvgodXuYJjij4HQ\" data-target-new-window=\"True\" data-url=\"https:\/\/goo.gl\/J8aMKx\">https:\/\/goo.gl\/J8aMKx<\/a><br \/>\nFederal judges invent a new legal standard where all legal precedent can be discarded to resist President Trump.<\/p>\n<p>The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals invented a new legal standard granting Muslims unlimited power over national security in their decision to maintain the injunction against President Trump\u2019s travel ban executive order (via Breitbart).<\/p>\n<p>The 10 judges in the majority upheld the decision of district courts that the executive order violated the Fourth Amendment on the basis of campaign rhetoric, inventing a new legal standard.<\/p>\n<p>The order, called Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry, \u201cspeaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination\u201d ruled the activist judges.<\/p>\n<p>The court\u2019s decision relies on a newly created legal standard that has no basis in previous Supreme Court decisions. The new standard allows plaintiffs to block neutral government actions on the basis of campaign or private statements.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn looking behind the face of the government\u2019s action for facts to show the alleged bad faith\u2026 the majority grants itself the power to conduct an extratextual search for evidence suggesting bad faith, which is exactly what three Supreme Court opinions have prohibited,\u201d wrote Judge Niemeyer in the dissent.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe majority, now for the first time, rejects these holdings in favor of its politically desired outcome,\u201d continues Judge Niemeyer, who was joined by just two other judges.<\/p>\n<p>However, in a 10-3 ruling the majority have their way, and the decision will surely be brought before the Supreme Court where the matter will be settled once and for all.<\/p>\n<p>The activists\u2019 decision is dangerous, not just for establishing a new legal standard that will have a chilling effect on speech, but the ruling will also allow Muslim plaintiffs to petition the courts to block just about any government action that predominantly affects Muslim-majority countries.<\/p>\n<p>Further, the court creates a new standard, where the feelings of a plaintiff can grant standing before a court. The Muslim plaintiff attempting to block the executive order was not affected by the travel ban directly, but claims the order increases hostilities towards Muslim-Americans.<\/p>\n<p>Essentially, the progressive activist judges are creating a new legal standard where the president can be blocked from acting in the name of national security if a member of a minority group finds the action offensive.<\/p>\n<p>If this decision is upheld by the Supreme Court, it will effectively block President Trump from taking any action against Muslim countries due to statements he made during the campaign offering unlimited protection to terrorist countries.<\/p>\n<p>Do you think we should move to impeach these activist judges? Please share the story on Facebook and tell us what you think because we want to hear YOUR voice!<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Published on May 26, 2017 BREAKING: 10 Federal Judges DEMAND Americans Surrender to Islam, What\u2019s Your Response? Check The My New Channel : https:\/\/goo.gl\/pAHH18 Please Subscribe: https:\/\/goo.gl\/J8aMKx Federal judges invent a new legal standard where all legal precedent can be discarded to resist President Trump. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals invented a new legal &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/breaking-10-federal-judges-demand-americans-surrender-to-islam-whats-your-response-youtube\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">BREAKING: 10 Federal Judges DEMAND Americans Surrender to Islam, What\u2019s Your Response? &#8211; YouTube<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[14,13,6],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1336"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1336"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1336\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1337,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1336\/revisions\/1337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}