{"id":3118,"date":"2018-12-11T17:15:15","date_gmt":"2018-12-11T22:15:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/?p=3118"},"modified":"2018-12-11T17:15:54","modified_gmt":"2018-12-11T22:15:54","slug":"trump-white-hats-pave-way-to-abolish-income-tax-publicly-but-hr1-law-which-abolishes-income-tax-for-informed-citizen-is-already-in-effect-write-exempt-on-your-w4-and-never-pay-income-taxes-ag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/trump-white-hats-pave-way-to-abolish-income-tax-publicly-but-hr1-law-which-abolishes-income-tax-for-informed-citizen-is-already-in-effect-write-exempt-on-your-w4-and-never-pay-income-taxes-ag\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump\/White Hats Pave Way to Abolish Income Tax Publicly, but HR1 Law (Which Abolishes Income Tax for Informed Citizen) Is Already in Effect – Write “Exempt” on Your W4 and Never Pay Income Taxes Again | Alternative"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Source: Trump\/White Hats Pave Way to Abolish Income Tax Publicly, but HR1 Law (Which Abolishes Income Tax for Informed Citizen) Is Already in Effect – Write “Exempt” on Your W4 and Never Pay Income Taxes Again | Alternative<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

So\u00a0taxation,\u00a0by impost and duty, by definition,\u00a0fundamentally\u00a0does not reach the\u00a0labors\u00a0of the American people\u00a0conducted in the fifty states, where the\u00a0labor\u00a0does not involve any import or export, or other\u00a0foreign\u00a0activity. And\u00a0Excise\u00a0taxes are now accepted as being\u00a0constitutionally\u00a0defined by both law and precedent (over 600 times) as: \u201ctaxes laid upon the manufacture, sale or consumption of commodities\u00a0within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges\u00a0\u2026\u00a0\u201c.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But Title 15 U.S.C. Section 17, plainly and clearly states that: \u201cThe labor of a human being is\u00a0not a commodity or article of commerce\u2026\u00a0\u201c. Under the U.S. Constitution this law\u00a0removes\u00a0\u201cthe(domestic)\u00a0labor of a human being\u00a0(American\u00a0citizens)\u201d\u00a0from subjectivity\u00a0to any and all\u00a0taxation by\u00a0excise\u00a0under\u00a0Article I, Section 8.<\/div>\n
This is of course why the United States\u2019 IRS, DOJ, and the entire federal judiciary (at this point) PREVIOUSLY have had to claim in court for 50 years that \u2013 it is the 16th Amendment that authorizes the income tax,\u00a0and not Article I, Section 8.\u00a0Thus, under Article I of the Constitution, there is an admitted\u00a0total lack of subjectivity\u00a0of the citizens to any and all\u00a0impost, duty\u00a0or\u00a0excise\u00a0taxation on\u00a0Labor,\u00a0i.e.: the\u00a0indirect\u00a0taxation of the citizen\u2019s\u00a0labor, or a tax upon the exercise of his or her\u00a0Right to Work\u00a0resulting in the payment of \u201csalary\u201d or \u201cwages\u201c,\u00a0does not apply\u00a0to citizens, because it is not statutorily authorized, now made enforceable, as it is fundamentally outside of the legal reach, and scope of legal effect, of\u00a0all\u00a0of the granted Constitutional authorities to tax\u00a0indirectly\u00a0under authority of Article I, Section 8, clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The reason why this is so important to understand, is because this basic information, concerning the proper, limited, application and enforcement of the constitutional, and constitutionally granted, powers to tax,\u00a0is essential\u00a0in properly and fully understanding the legal issue of the\u00a0limited\u00a0subject-matter jurisdiction\u00a0of the federal courts\u00a0that exists with respect to the taxation of the individual citizens. A proper and complete understanding of this legal issue, immediately leads to the realization that there is no constitutionally granted\u00a0subject-matter jurisdiction\u00a0that can be taken over a civil action to adjudicate and or enforce the claims that are alleged by the United States in any\u00a0Complaint\u00a0filed in a legal action that is filed in the federal courts to pursue the enforcement of the payment of a personal income tax against an individual American citizen as defendant. In the United States of America, under the Constitution of the United States of America, our federal courts are courts of\u00a0only\u00a0limited, specifically enumerated,\u00a0constitutionally\u00a0granted, powers, that\u00a0only exist\u00a0as written in the law. The courts cannot enforce ideas, or a philosophy, or custom or habit, or ritual, or beliefs, or even common sense.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The courts can only enforce the written law of the statutes of the Titles of United States Code. Nothing else.\u00a0And of course, under the Constitution of the United States of America, a statute (law), can only be written by Congress where,<\/div>\n
first: \u2013 the Constitution grants a specific\u00a0power\u00a0to be exercised by the Congress (as is done in Article I, Section 8); and\u00a0second: the Constitution\u00a0specifically grants\u00a0the\u00a0authority to the Congress to write law\u00a0(as is done in Article I, Section 8, clause 18)<\/em>, with specific applicability to the enforcement of the\u00a0power(s) granted, that was, or were,\u00a0exercised\u00a0in\u00a0operational practice\u00a0(enforcement) by the government (IRS).<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
So,\u00a0the three required elements\u00a0of our constitutional law in America,\u00a0necessary to establish the\u00a0subject-matter jurisdiction\u00a0of the courtthat can be taken over any legal action,\u00a0sufficient to allow that court<\/em>\u00a0to entertain and adjudicate the action in the court, are:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
(1) a specific power must be granted by the Constitution or Amendment for Congress (the United States) to exercise;<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
(2) a specific grant of authority for Congress to write law must be made by the Constitution or Amendment, with respect to the administration and enforcement of the specific power granted in (#1) above 2; and,<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
(3) a specific statute must be legislatively enacted by an authorized Congress, with specific application to the enforcement of the specific\u00a0power\u00a0alleged granted and exercised in (#1) above, and\u00a0made<\/em>\u00a0enforceable\u00a0with authorized law under (#2) above.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
These fundamental elements of constitutional law, controlling the ability of a federal court to lawfully take a granted\u00a0subject-matter jurisdiction\u00a0over a legal claim made by complainant (like the United States) in the federal district court, combined with the irrefutable\u00a0lack\u00a0of any\u00a0enabling\u00a0enforcement clause\u00a0that exists in the 16th Amendment as adopted,\u00a0make the United States\u2019 claims in the courts that the 16th Amendment is the foundational authority for the enforcement of the income tax against the individual citizens, on the mere basis of being a \u201cperson\u201d with alleged \u201cgross income\u201d, appear dubious at best, and a complete and total lie at worst<\/em>, as this lack of granted constitutional authority to write law under the 16th Amendment also explains the\u00a0alleged\u00a0tax-protestors\u2019 claims of the last 50 years, that \u2013 if the tax is under the 16th Amendment, then the tax\u00a0must\u00a0be voluntary, as\u00a0no\u00a0law is\u00a0constitutionally\u00a0authorized\u00a0to be written by Congress, and therefore\u00a0no law can exist, or\u00a0does exist,\u00a0under the 16th Amendment that effects the\u00a0income\u00a0of the citizens directly<\/em>, without the underlying foundational use of the\u00a0impost, duty\u00a0and\u00a0excise\u00a0taxing authorities of Article I first being made applicable.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
i.e.\u00a0: a specific\u00a0enabling\u00a0enforcement clause\u00a0of the Constitution,\u00a0or one of its\u00a0Amendments, must be shown to have\u00a0been made applicable to the\u00a0specific\u00a0taxing power\u00a0alleged\u00a0constitutionally\u00a0granted, and\u00a0operationally practiced\u00a0under (#1) above;<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
So the lower federal district and circuit courts have over time,\u00a0seditiously\u00a0reversed\u00a0the Supreme Court\u2019s original and true holding in 1916 \u2013 that the\u00a0income\u00a0tax is authorized and is constitutional under the granted and enforceable\u00a0indirect\u00a0Article I taxing authorities, as a\u00a0measure\u00a0of the amount of the\u00a0indirect\u00a0tax that is imposed on the\u00a0income\u00a0derived from the\u00a0impost, duty\u00a0or\u00a0excise\u00a0taxable\u00a0activities or\u00a0persons,<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u2013 who are made subject by the tax law to the payment of the\u00a0uniform impost, duty\u00a0or\u00a0excise;<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u2013 which does\u00a0not constitute\u00a0an unconstitutionally\u00a0unapportioned\u00a0direct\u00a0tax. The Supreme Court plainly held in 1916, in the\u00a0Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR Co.,\u00a0240 US 1 (1916) and\u00a0Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916) cases, that the\u00a0income\u00a0tax is an\u00a0indirect\u00a0tax under Article I,\u00a0and is\u00a0not\u00a0a\u00a0direct\u00a0tax under the 16th Amendment.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Again: \u201c. . . The provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment\u00a0conferred no new power of\u00a0taxation\u00a0but simply\u00a0prohibited\u00a0the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning\u00a0from being taken out\u00a0of\u00a0the category of\u00a0indirect taxation\u00a0to which it\u00a0inherently belonged .\u201d<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Source: Trump\/White Hats Pave Way to Abolish Income Tax Publicly, but HR1 Law (Which Abolishes Income Tax for Informed Citizen) Is Already in Effect – Write “Exempt” on Your W4 and Never Pay Income Taxes Again | Alternative So\u00a0taxation,\u00a0by impost and duty, by definition,\u00a0fundamentally\u00a0does not reach the\u00a0labors\u00a0of the American people\u00a0conducted in the fifty states, where … Continue reading Trump\/White Hats Pave Way to Abolish Income Tax Publicly, but HR1 Law (Which Abolishes Income Tax for Informed Citizen) Is Already in Effect – Write “Exempt” on Your W4 and Never Pay Income Taxes Again | Alternative<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3118"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3118"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3118\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3120,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3118\/revisions\/3120"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}