{"id":5118,"date":"2020-04-01T05:13:33","date_gmt":"2020-04-01T10:13:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/?p=5118"},"modified":"2020-04-01T05:19:23","modified_gmt":"2020-04-01T10:19:23","slug":"important-questions-regarding-the-current-health-situation-zoom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/important-questions-regarding-the-current-health-situation-zoom\/","title":{"rendered":"Important Questions Regarding the Current Health Situation – Zoom"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Source: Important Questions Regarding the Current Health Situation – Zoom<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

A Scientist\/Medical Person tells the\u00a0protocol for determining a virus:<\/u><\/i><\/b><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
From medical forum (Prefers to stay anonymous, presenting a different narrative than the official one can cost you a lot in the toxic environment these days.)<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/div>\n
I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.<\/span><\/div>\n
This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold\/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold\/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.<\/span><\/div>\n
The \u2018gold standard\u2019 in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated\/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not PCR that is currently being used or Serology \/antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample o47 \u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n
f your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for \u2018viral sequences\u2019, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.<\/span><\/div>\n
The problem is the test is known not to work.<\/span><\/div>\n
It uses \u2018amplification\u2019 which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.<\/span><\/div>\n
Additionally, it\u2019s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.<\/span><\/div>\n
The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus \u2013 say the huge family of coronavirus. But that\u2019s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.<\/span><\/div>\n
And that\u2019s not even getting into the other issue \u2013 viral load.<\/span><\/div>\n
If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that\u2019s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can\u2019t determine if a osteogenesis is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.<\/span><\/div>\n
If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren\u2019t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.<\/span><\/div>\n
And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.<\/span><\/div>\n
Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic \u2013 pick a coronavirus.<\/span><\/div>\n
They are incredibly common and there\u2019s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you\u2019re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.<\/span><\/div>\n
There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.<\/span><\/div>\n
All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location \u2013 say Wuhan \u2013 administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a \u2018new\u2019 disease.<\/span><\/div>\n
Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.<\/span><\/div>\n
You can then say this \u2018new\u2019 virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more \u2018cases\u2019, which expands the testing, which produces yet more \u2018cases\u2019 and so on and so on.<\/span><\/div>\n
Before long you have your \u2018pandemic\u2019, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn\u2019t actually exist.<\/span><\/div>\n
Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.<\/span><\/div>\n
Your only problem is going to be that \u2013 due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people you are mislabelling \u2013 your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.<\/span><\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n
But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.<\/span><\/div>\n
1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.<\/span><\/div>\n
2. You can tell people that \u2018minimizing\u2019 the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.<\/span><\/div>\n
3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.<\/span><\/div>\n
4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your \u2018case figures\u2019 with \u2018asymptomatic carriers\u2019 (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.<\/span><\/div>\n
Take these simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.<\/span><\/div>\n
They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Source: Important Questions Regarding the Current Health Situation – Zoom A Scientist\/Medical Person tells the\u00a0protocol for determining a virus: From medical forum (Prefers to stay anonymous, presenting a different narrative than the official one can cost you a lot in the toxic environment these days.) I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we … Continue reading Important Questions Regarding the Current Health Situation – Zoom<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[54],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5118"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5118"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5118\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5122,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5118\/revisions\/5122"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esterlund.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}