BREAKING: Entire Indiana Police Dept. Quits After Being Told To Do These 3 SICK Things – YouTube

Published on May 30, 2017

BREAKING: Entire Indiana Police Dept. Quits After Being Told To Do These 3 SICK Things

Check The My New Channel :
Please Subscribe:
Unfortunately, liberalism has so infected our culture that disregard for our police officers is now widespread. Those who most deserve our respect — the men and women who put themselves in harm’s way to keep us safe — are constantly hindered from doing their job properly.

That’s being seen in a shocking new case unfolding in Bunker Hill, Miami County, Indiana, where the entire police force has resigned because the town council repeatedly asked them to perform “illegal, unethical, and immoral activities.”

Michael Thomison, who has served as Town Marshall for the last four years, is leading the resignation of himself and four volunteer reserve officers. Thomison and his team had been considering resignation for months after being subject to ongoing harassment and intimidation from the local politicians.

One of the main charges against the Bunker Hill Town Council is that they wanted to use the police to collect information on their political rivals. The police officers refused to take part in unethical abuses of their resources.

The resignation letter presented by the former officers states that members of the town council continuously requested background checks on fellow councilors. They wanted to uncover their criminal history.

Thomison states that when he and his team did not comply with the illegal orders, they were threatened. The local police found themselves in a situation of choosing between morality and their livelihood.

The resigned officers also resigned because the town failed to provide them with the funding and equipment necessary to face the dangers of their job. There was not enough quality body armor to go around, putting the policemen’s lives at risk when out on the streets.
Thomison said: “I did not want to send someone out there with bad body armor so I would take mine off and provide it to the other officers. I told them we have to provide this, there is an IC code that explains that and says that the town has to provide that body armor.”

For Thomison, there were also personal reasons relating to his resignation. He took time off after being diagnosed with cancer. But after he was prepared to return to work, the city would only give him part-time work. The city was playing with an officer’s career as an intimidation game to cajole him into getting in line with their demands.

Bunker Hill residents are feeling the loss of their police force. The police provide an invaluable service. Local families no longer feel safe without them. For the moment, the town is receiving protection from the county sheriff’s office while they work on hiring a new group of police. However, many officers who have been contacted are familiar with the situation and have refused the job.

As expected, the town council denies that it’s been involved in any wrongdoing. They assert that the differences between them and the police department had nothing to do with illegal requests or with lack of body armor. (via Fox 59).

It’s frustrating that when money is wasted on causes that shouldn’t be receiving public funding–like illegal aliens and refugees — there’s seemingly nothing left over for the folks who go so far as giving their lives to protect American families.

Just as angering is the thought that corrupt politicians see police as nothing more than pawns to use for their immoral plans — rather than the heroes they really are.
Do you believe our police officers should be well-funded and respected? Share this story on Facebook and let us know because we want to hear your voice!

Trump Spits In Merkel & Obama’s Faces, Says ‘Hell No’ To 1 Thing They Very Badly Need – YouTube

Published on May 29, 2017

We are here bringing you the latest News Headlines Daily.
Just for information, we do not actually create and/or make up these news, we are simply searching for the leading stories worldwide, and then we post them to keep you guys informed.
You can think of us as a news search engine 😉
(As you all know by now) the media isn’t always trustworthy, so you need to make the decision by yourself if the news is true or just an hoax. Need we remind you what we said in the beginning, we are bringing headlines from leading news channels worldwide 🙂

Angry Pope slaps Trump’s hand | Awkward MOMENT – YouTube

Published on May 25, 2017

Pope Francis Slaps Donald Trump’s Hand For Touching Him Video Angry Pope Slaps Trump’s Hand Away , Angry Pope Francis slaps Donald Trump’s Hand For Touching Him – The Hand Of God rebukes Trump, After Melania slaps Donald Trump when he tries to hold her hand Pope also swats Donald Trump’s hand away. The tale of Donald Trump’s visit with Pope Francis. Pope Francis ‘didn’t smile’ in response to Trump,weirdest creepiest awkward funny Idiotic and crazy moments from of the donald j Trump’s and Melania Trump – King Salman in Brussels, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Vatican
courtesy: CNN

Look Who Was Just Found DEAD After What They Were About To Expose On Hillary – YouTube

Published on May 26, 2017

Look Who Was Just Found DEAD After What They Were About To Expose On Hillary

Check The My New Channel :
Please Subscribe:
Over the last several weeks, the Seth Rich murder case has been heating up. More people have been demanding answers over Rich’s mysterious murder. You see, people don’t buy the “official” story that the mainstream media has been pushing and rightfully so. The official story of Rich’s death never really passed the sniff test in my opinion, and here is why.

Rich’s body was found in a secluded area in what the police say was a robbery gone wrong. Well, I guess I would buy that story if Rich’s wallet, money, and credit cards were taken, but they weren’t. Also, there have been witnesses that have stepped forward to say that Rich was in communication with WikiLeaks.
So, it should come as no surprise that people are questioning. You see, the American people have been lied to for so long by the media and the elites in Washington that we know there is more to the story. Which is why when we hear that someone else died who is connected to Hillary Clinton our antennas perk up. Which is why there are still major questions being asked about former United Nations (U.N.) official John Ashe.

Here is more from The Political Insider:

A bombshell report shows that Ashe, who was found dead last week, supposedly due to a heart attack, is having the reason for death brought into question.

Police officers in the city of Dobbs Ferry, New York have claimed he instead died by a crushed throat in a “workout accident.”

Ashe was scheduled to testify in court today, along with Ng Lap Seng – a Chinese businessman and co-defendant – who received more than $1 billion during his term as president of the U.N. in donations.
Sing also found ways to illegally funnel money to Democrats during President Bill Clinton’s term in office.

Could this be Hillary Clinton silencing people who “know too much?”

Ng was identified in a 1998 Senate report as the source of hundreds of thousands of dollars illegally funneled through an Arkansas restaurant owner, Charlie Trie, to the Democratic National Committee during the Clinton administration. (Ng was not charged with any crime.)

Ng and Trie had visited the White House several times for Democratic fund-raising events and were photographed with then-President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton.

One source told me, “During the trial, the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng. It would have been very embarrassing. His death was conveniently timed.”

Ashe’s lawyer Jeremy Schneider told me he is sure Ashe’s death was an accident. “There is not one iota of evidence that it was homicide. This is nothing at all like Vince Foster.”

Police in Dobbs Ferry village are keeping the investigation open pending an autopsy by the Westchester medical examiner.
I mean the mob has nothing on Hillary Clinton and her death count, right?

Of course, that sounds suspicious to me and I am sure to you as well. First, it was said that Ashe suffered a heart attack, but then, later on, it was said his throat was crushed from a “workplace accident”. Now, on the surface, it could be brushed aside as coincidence, but considering that Ashe was scheduled to testify in court it just doesn’t sit right. The real question is what did Ashe know that could harm the Clinton mafia machine.

There is plenty of reason to believe that Hillary Clinton had something to do with this death as well. These people are ruthless and will stop at nothing to keep their dirty secrets hidden from the American people. So, it makes sense after knowing about the deaths of Vince Foster, Seth Rich, and John Ashe why Sean Hannity would back away from researching Rich’s death.

Who knows what was said to Seth Rich’s family or Sean Hannity to get them to be silent. I do believe that the Clinton’s are aware that time is running out for them. After all these years of being able to literally get away with murder, their crime spree is in jeopardy. I can only hope that a special prosecutor will be appointed to investigate Clinton and her nasty crimes.

These victims families deserve to justice for their loved one’s deaths and it is about time we give it to them.

BREAKING: 10 Federal Judges DEMAND Americans Surrender to Islam, What’s Your Response? – YouTube

Published on May 26, 2017

BREAKING: 10 Federal Judges DEMAND Americans Surrender to Islam, What’s Your Response?

Check The My New Channel :
Please Subscribe:
Federal judges invent a new legal standard where all legal precedent can be discarded to resist President Trump.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals invented a new legal standard granting Muslims unlimited power over national security in their decision to maintain the injunction against President Trump’s travel ban executive order (via Breitbart).

The 10 judges in the majority upheld the decision of district courts that the executive order violated the Fourth Amendment on the basis of campaign rhetoric, inventing a new legal standard.

The order, called Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry, “speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination” ruled the activist judges.

The court’s decision relies on a newly created legal standard that has no basis in previous Supreme Court decisions. The new standard allows plaintiffs to block neutral government actions on the basis of campaign or private statements.

“In looking behind the face of the government’s action for facts to show the alleged bad faith… the majority grants itself the power to conduct an extratextual search for evidence suggesting bad faith, which is exactly what three Supreme Court opinions have prohibited,” wrote Judge Niemeyer in the dissent.

“The majority, now for the first time, rejects these holdings in favor of its politically desired outcome,” continues Judge Niemeyer, who was joined by just two other judges.

However, in a 10-3 ruling the majority have their way, and the decision will surely be brought before the Supreme Court where the matter will be settled once and for all.

The activists’ decision is dangerous, not just for establishing a new legal standard that will have a chilling effect on speech, but the ruling will also allow Muslim plaintiffs to petition the courts to block just about any government action that predominantly affects Muslim-majority countries.

Further, the court creates a new standard, where the feelings of a plaintiff can grant standing before a court. The Muslim plaintiff attempting to block the executive order was not affected by the travel ban directly, but claims the order increases hostilities towards Muslim-Americans.

Essentially, the progressive activist judges are creating a new legal standard where the president can be blocked from acting in the name of national security if a member of a minority group finds the action offensive.

If this decision is upheld by the Supreme Court, it will effectively block President Trump from taking any action against Muslim countries due to statements he made during the campaign offering unlimited protection to terrorist countries.

Do you think we should move to impeach these activist judges? Please share the story on Facebook and tell us what you think because we want to hear YOUR voice!

Federal Judges Invite Muslims To Veto Americans’ Elections Over Campaign Statements

Ten progressive judges in Virginia have decided that Muslims can ask judges to change the nation’s national security and immigration policies whenever prior campaign statements in democratic political elections can be described as unfair to Muslims living in America.

Unless corrected by the Supreme Court, the majority’s new approach, which is unsupported by any Supreme Court case, will become a sword for plaintiffs to challenge facially neutral government actions, particularly those affecting regions dominated by a single religion. Government officials will avoid speaking about religion, even privately, lest a court discover statements that could be used to ascribe a religious motivation to their future actions. And, in the more immediate future, our courts will be faced with the unworkable task of determining when this President’s supposed religious motive [in the 2016 election] has sufficiently dissipated so as to allow executive action toward these or other majority Muslim countries.