2020 Presidential Election Lawsuits Related to Election Integrity | (Public Version 2-5-21) | (Note: the list is sorted chronologically) | ||||||||
Trump as Plaintiff: Case Name and Number |
Date Filed | Topic * | Decided on Merits ** | State | Issue(s) | Disposition | Ruling Favored | Date of Last Order | Status | |
Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Boockvar, No. 2:20-cv-00966 (Western D PA) | 6/29/20 | PROCESS | NO | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes; Witness and/or Notary Requirement; Failure to include ID/Doc. etc.) | Dismissed – Lack Standing on federal claims; Other claims did not have a statutory basis | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/10/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President v. Cegavske, No. 2:20-cv-01445 (District NV) | 8/04/20 | RULES | NO | Nevada | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing and Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/22/20 | Closed | |
RNC v. Miller, No. 06571 EQCV095986 (Iowa District Court, Linn County) | 8/10/20 | RULES | YES | Iowa | Vote-by-Mail (pre-populating ballots should not be allowed) | Granted Injunction. Iowa counties were told to send blank ballots | Trump/GOP | 12/20/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President v. Murphy, No. 3:20-cv-10753 (District NJ) | 8/19/20 | RULES | NO | New Jersey | Governor mandates all votes to be by mail | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/22/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President et al v. Bullock et al, No. 6:20-cv-00066 (D. Mont.) | 9/02/20 | RULES | TBD | Montana | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that the Governor exceeded his authority, etc.) | Consolidated with Lamm case | TBD | 9/30/20 | Consolidated | |
Monmouth County Republican Committee v. Way, No. 3:20-cv-13914 (District Court of NJ) & No. MON-L-003019-20 (NJ Superior Court, Monmouth County) | 9/24/20 | RULES | NO | New Jersey | Various absentee ballot issues | Consolidated with Murphy case | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/20/20 | Consolidated | |
Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Philadelphia County Board of Elections, No. 200902035 (PA Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 10/01/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | Poll observers were not allowed at early voting locations | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 10/23/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Philadelphia County, No. 983 CD 2020 (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court) | 10/15/20 | |||||||||
In re November 3, 2020 Gen. Election, No. 149 MM 2020 (Penn. Supreme Court) | 10/04/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Signature Verification | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 12/21/20 | Active | |
Trump v. Boockvar, No. 20- (US Supreme Court) | 12/20/20 | Vote-by-Mail (Poll Observer Access; Signature Verification Standards; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | TBD | TBD | ||||||
Donald J. Trump for President v. Simon, No. A20-1362 (Minn. Supreme Court) | 10/28/20 | RULES | YES | Minnesota | Vote-by-Mail (Mail Voting Deadlines [for Applying, Receiving, Postmark]) | Granted Injunction. Sequestration of late ballots | Trump/GOP | 10/29/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President v. Gloria, No. A-20-824153-C (NV District Court) | 11/03/20 | RULES | YES | Nevada | Requested voting time extension | Granted. Extended poll hours. | Trump/GOP | 11/3/20 | Closed | |
In Re: Canvassing Observation, No. 7003 (PA Ct. Common Pleas, Phil. Cnty) | 11/03/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Poll observers do not have sufficient proximity to canvassing. | Denied – Poll observer access | Election Administrators | 1/11/21 | Active | |
In Re: Canvassing Observation, No. 1094 CD 2020 (PA Commonwealth Ct) | 11/04/20 | Appeal Granted – Poll observer access | Trump/GOP | |||||||
In Re: Canvassing Observation, No. 30 EAP 2020 (Penn. Supreme Court) | 11/05/20 | Reversed | Election Administrators | |||||||
Trump v. Boockvar, No. 30 EAP 2020 (US Supreme Court) | 12/20/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Donald J. Trump for President v. Benson, No. 20-000225-MZ (MI Court of Claims) | 11/04/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Drop Boxes/Drop Off Locations; Poll Observer Access) | Dismissed – Lacked Timeliness; Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/11/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President v. Benson, No. 355378 (MI Appeals Court) | 11/30/20 | |||||||||
Donald J. Trump for President v. Benson, No. 162320 (MI Supreme Court) | 12/17/20 | |||||||||
Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Kathy Boockvar, et al., No. 602 MD 2020 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania) | 11/04/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Sec of State can not allow ID proof to be delayed by several days) | Granted Injunction. Late ballots without ID not counted. | Trump/GOP | 11/12/20 | Closed | |
In re Enforcement of Election Laws and Securing Ballots Cast or Received After 7:00 P.M. on November 3, 2020, No. SPCV20-00982 (GA Superior Court) | 11/04/20 | RULES | YES | Georgia | Sequestration of Absentee Ballots submitted after Election Day | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 11/5/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Philadelphia Cnty. Bd. of Elections, No. 2:20-cv-05533-PD (Eastern District Court Pennsylvania) | 11/05/20 | PROCESS | NA | Pennsylvania | Poll observers at early voting locations | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/5/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of Elections… | 11/05/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | No addresses on 600± absentee ballots | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 11/13/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Hobbs, No. CV2020-014248 (AZ Super) | 11/07/20 | PROCESS | NO | Arizona | Cancelled votes | Dismissed – Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/16/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Boockvar, No. 4:20-cv-02078 (M.D. PA) | 11/09/20 | RULES | NO | Pennsylvania | Insufficient poll watching of absentee ballots, etc. | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/27/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Boockvar, No. 20-3371 (3rd Circuit) | 11/22/20 | |||||||||
Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, No. 20-3371 (3rd Cir Appeals) | 11/23/20 | Appellants seek review of the district court for denying their Motion to Amend … | ||||||||
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Board of Elections, No. 20-05786-35 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County) | 11/09/20 | PROCESS | YES | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail Issue: 2177 Ballots were objected to for various reasons — e.g. unsigned, etc. It then came down to 69 ballots received in unsealed envelopes. | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 12/8/20 | Closed | |
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Board of Elections, No. 1191 PA Commonwealth Court 2020 | 11/20/20 | |||||||||
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Board of Elections, Nos. 174/676 MAL 2020 (PA Supreme Court) | 11/21/20 | |||||||||
In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020 General Election, No. 20110894 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail Issues (Poll Observer Access; Signature Verification Standards; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | Denied – Interpretation of Election Code (voter did not print name nor include street address) | Election Administrators | 12/20/20 | Active | |
” ” ” ” No. 20110895 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
” ” ” ” No. 20110896 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
” ” ” ” No. 20110897 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
” ” ” ” No. 20110898 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
” ” ” ” No. 31 EAP 2020 | 11/18/20 | |||||||||
Trump v. Boockvar, Nos. 31 EAP 2020, 32 EAP 2020, 33 EAP 2020, 34 EAP 2020, 35 EAP 2020, 29 WAP 2020 (US Supreme Court) | 12/20/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Benson, No. 1:20-cv-01083 (W.D. Mich.) | 11/11/20 | PROCESS | NA | Michigan | For Wayne County not to certify their results | Voluntarily Withdrawn | Trump/GOP: Wayne County votes not certified | 11/19/20 | Closed | |
Lin Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG (North District Georgia) | 11/13/20 | RULES | NO | Georgia | State allowed procedures that are different from the Georgia Election Code | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/17/20 | Active | |
Lin Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 20-14418 (11th Circuit) | 11/24/20 | |||||||||
Lin Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 20-799 (US Supreme Court) | 12/08/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Trump v. Evers, No. 2020AP1971-OA (Wisconsin Supreme Court) | 12/01/20 | PROCESS | NO | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | Dismissed – Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/3/20 | Closed | |
Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commissions, No. 2:20-cv-01785 (E.D. Wis.) | 12/02/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Denied: Moot; Statutes not violated. | Election Administrators | 1/11/21 | Active | |
Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commissions, No. 20-3414 (7th Circuit Court) | 12/12/20 | Authority To Act (Electors Clause) | Denied: Laches; Statutes not violated | |||||||
Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commissions, No. 20-883 (US Supreme Court) | 12/30/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Trump v. Biden, No. 2020CV007092 (WI Superior Court, Milwaukee County) | 12/03/20 | RULES & PROCESS | TBD | Wisconsin | Recount; Illegal Ballots Cast | Court affirmed recount | Election Administrators | 1/11/21 | Active | |
Trump v. Biden, No. 2020AP2038 (Wisconsin Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | Illegal Ballots Cast | Denied: Laches; Statutes not violated | |||||||
Trump v. Biden, No. 20-882 (US Supreme Court) | 12/29/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Trump v. Raffensperger, No. 2020CV343255 (GA Superior Court, Fulton County) | 12/04/20 | RULES | NA | Georgia | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/7/21 | Closed | |
Trump v. Raffensperger, No. S21M0561 (Georgia Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | Authority To Act (Other) | Dismissed – Jurisdiction | |||||||
Trump v. Toulouse Oliver, No. 1:20-cv-01289 (District Court, New Mexico) | 12/14/20 | PROCESS | NO | New Mexico | Vote-by-Mail (Drop Boxes/Drop Off Locations) | Voluntarily Withdrawn | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/15/20 | Closed | |
Trump v. Kemp, 1:20-cv-05310-MHC (North District Georgia) | 12/31/20 | RULES | NO | Georgia | Authority To Act (Electors Clause) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/5/21 | Closed | |
Decisions with Trump as Plaintiff Subtotals = | 28 | 8 | Note: Trump prevailed in 4 out of 8 cases decided on the merits | Trump as Plaintiff: Active = | 6 | |||||
Election Integrity Cases where Trump was not Plaintiff: Case Name and Number |
Date Filed | Topic * | Decided on Merits ** | State | Issue(s) | Disposition | Ruling Favored | Date of Last Order | Status | |
Curtin v. VA State Bd. of Elections, No. 1:20-cv-00546 (E.D. Virginia) | 5/13/20 | RULES | NO | Virginia | Absentee ballots increases voter fraud | Dismissed – Laches | Case Not Fully Heard | 9/7/20 | Closed | |
Ritchie v. Polis, No. 2020CV31708 (Colorado District Court, Denver) | 5/18/20 | RULES | YES | Colorado | Objected to the Governor being able to change some of the Vote-by-Mail rules. | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 9/1/20 | Closed | |
Ritchie v. Polis, No. 20CA983 (Colorado Court Appeals) | 6/01/20 | |||||||||
Ritchie v. Polis, No. 20SC453 (Colorado Supreme Court) | 6/10/20 | Overturned | Trump/GOP | |||||||
Davis v. Benson, No. 20-000099-MM (MI Court of Claims) | 5/28/20 | RULES | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Other Vote-by-Mail Issue) [Consolidated with Black v. Benson and Cooper-Keel v. Benson.] | Denied on statutory basis, as Plaintiff did not show irreparable harm, etc. | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/6/20 | Active | |
Davis v. Benson, No. 1:20-cv-00768 (MI Western District Court) | 8/13/20 | |||||||||
Davis v. Benson, No. 354622 (Michigan Court of Appeals) | 8/14/20 | |||||||||
Davis v. Benson, No. 1:20-cv-00981 (MI Western District Court) | 10/14/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Daunt v. Benson, Case 1:20-cv-00522-RJJ-RSK (MI Western District Court) | 6/09/20 | VOTER | TBD | Michigan | Clean-up, purge voter rolls | TBD | TBD | 9/11/20 | Active | |
Reed-Pratt v. Winfrey, No. 3:20-cv-12129 (MI Eastern District Court) | 8/08/20 | RULES | TBD | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail: Unsolicited mailing of absentee voter application | Dismissed as Legislation Pending | Trump/GOP | 10/27/20 | Active | |
Reed-Pratt v. Winfrey, No. 20-1876 (6th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 9/10/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
RNC v. Weipert, No. 06521 CVCV081957 (Iowa District Court, Johnson County) | 8/10/20 | RULES | YES | Iowa | Vote-by-Mail (Signature Verification Standards; Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Other Vote-by-Mail Issue) | Corrective Action Ordered | Trump/GOP | 9/12/20 | Closed | |
Moore v. Circosta, No. 4:20-cv-00182 (Eastern District of NC) | 8/10/20 | RULES | NO | North Carolina | Plaintiffs oppose relaxation of voting requirements due to COVID-19 | Dismissed – Lacked Standing & Laches | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/6/20 | Closed | |
Moore v. Circosta, No. 20-02107 (4th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/15/20 | |||||||||
Moore v. Circosta, No. 20A72 (US Supreme Court) | 10/22/20 | |||||||||
RNC v. Gill, No. 03971 EQCV193154 (Iowa District Court, Woodbury County) | 8/14/20 | RULES | YES | Iowa | Prepopulating of mail-in ballots | Injunction Granted | Trump/GOP | 10/16/20 | Closed | |
RNC v. Gill, No. 20-1169 (Iowa Supreme Court) | 8/15/20 | Stay Granted | ||||||||
Election Integrity Fund v. Benson, No. 20-000169-MM (MI Court of Claims) | 8/24/20 | RULES | TBD | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail: Allowing online applications | TBD | TBD | 9/21/20 | Active | |
Texas v. Hollins, No. 2020-52383 (TX District Court, Harris County) | 8/31/20 | RULES | YES | Texas | County Clerk sending mail-in ballots to all voters in the election. | Insufficient evidence of harm | GOP Defendant | 10/17/20 | Closed | |
Texas v. Hollins, NO. 14-20-00627-CV (Texas Court of Appeals) | 9/14/20 | |||||||||
Texas v. Hollins, Nos. 20-0715, 20-0729 (Texas Supreme Court) | 9/22/20 | Over turned and agreed w Plaintiff | ||||||||
Election Integrity Project of NV v. NV, No. A-20-820510-C (NV Dist Ct, Clark Cnty) | 9/01/20 | RULES | NO | Nevada | New Nevada statute AB4 increased likelihood of voter fraud | Dismissed – Lacked Ripeness | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/18/20 | Closed | |
Election Integrity Project of NV v. Nevada, No. 81847 (NV Superior Court) | 9/25/20 | |||||||||
Martel v. Condos, No. 5:20-cv-00131 (District of Vermont) | 9/04/20 | RULES | NO | Vermont | Sec of State exceeded their authority | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/15/20 | Closed | |
Lamm v. Bullock, No. 6:20-cv-00067 (District Court Montana) | 9/09/20 | RULES | TBD | Montana | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that the Governor exceeded his authority, etc.) | Insufficient Evidence | Election Administrators | 10/17/20 | Active | |
Lamm v. Bullock, No. 20-35847 (9th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 9/30/20 | Appeal | ||||||||
Lamm v. Bullock, No. 20-35847 (No. 20A61 (US Supreme Court) | 10/06/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Carson et al v. Simon, No. 0:20-cv-02030 (District Court Minnesota) | 9/22/20 | RULES | YES | Minnesota | Objected to State not enforcing Minnesota’s Election-Day ballot receipt deadline | Denied request | Trump/GOP | 11/5/20 | Closed | |
Carson v. Simon, No. 20-3139 (8th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/20/20 | Granted: Reversed lower court | ||||||||
Penn. Voters Alliance v. Centre County, No. 4:20-cv-01761 (M.D. PA) | 9/25/20 | RULES | TBD | Pennsylvania | Private Funding Encourages Illegal Ballots [At Supreme Court combined w similar lawsuits from other states: WI, MI, MN, IO, TX, GA, SC.] | Dismissed – Lacked Standing & Laches | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/13/20 | Active | |
Penn. Voters Alliance v. Centre County, No. 20-3175 (3d Circuit Appeals) | 10/22/21 | |||||||||
Penn. Voters Alliance v. Centre Cnty., No. 20-553 (US Supreme Court) | 10/26/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Wise v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections, No. 5:20-cv-00505 (E.D. NC) | 9/26/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | North Carolina | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution, etc.) | At US Supreme Court this case was consolidated with Moore v. Circosta | TBD | 12/6/20 | Consolidated | |
Wise v. NC State Bd. of Elections, No. 20-2063 (4th Circuit Appeals) | 10/18/20 | Extension of voting deadlines | ||||||||
Wise v. NC State Bd. of Elections, No. 20A71 (US Supreme Court) | 10/26/20 | |||||||||
Republican Party of PA v. Boockvar, Et Al., 20A84 (US Supreme Court) | 9/28/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Mail Voting Deadlines [for Applying, Receiving, Postmark]) | Stay Granted | Trump/GOP | 11/6/20 | Closed | |
Judicial Watch v Griswold, Case 1:20-cv-02992 (Colorado District Court) | 10/05/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Colorado | Bloated Voter Rolls | TBD | TBD | 1/14/21 | Active | |
Arnett v. NC State Bd of Elections, No. 20 CVS 00570 (NC Sup Ct, Duplin Cnty) | 10/05/20 | PROCESS | TBD | North Carolina | Transparency in counting Absentee Ballots | TBD | TBD | 10/20/20 | Active | |
Reed v. Virginia Dept. of Elections (Frederick Circuit Court) | 10/09/20 | RULES | YES | Virginia | Enforce statutes governing the acceptance of absentee ballots with respect to postmarks | Granted | GOP Defendant | 1/13/21 | Closed | |
PILF v. Boockvar No. No. 1:20-cv-1905 (Middle District Court of PA) | 10/15/20 | VOTER | TBD | Pennsylvania | Clean-up, purge voter rolls, esp deceased | TBD | TBD | 10/19/20 | Active | |
Bognet v. Boockvar, No. 3:20-cv-00215 (Western District Pennsylvania) | 10/22/20 | RULES | TBD | Pennsylvania | Illegal extension of voting deadline | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | TBD | 1/25/21 | Active | |
Bognet v. Boockvar, No. 20-3214 (3rd Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/29/20 | |||||||||
Bognet v. Boockvar 20-740 (US Supreme Court) | 11/20/20 | TBD | ||||||||
Kraus v. Cegavske, No. 20 OC 00142 1B (Nev. Dist. Ct., Carson City) | 10/23/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | Nevada | Vote-by-Mail (Poll Observer Access; Signature Verification Standards; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | TBD | 11/10/20 | Active | |
Kraus v. Cegavske, No. 82018 (Nev. Sup. Ct.) | 11/03/20 | Remand back to lower court | ||||||||
Hotze v. Hollins (Supreme Court of Texas) | 10/27/20 | RULES | NO | Texas | Whether drive-through voting should be allowed | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Election Administrators | 12/17/20 | Closed | |
Hotze v. Hollins No. 20-20574 (U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit) | 11/02/20 | |||||||||
Nevada Republican Central Committee v. Clark County, No. A-20-8238210W (Nevada District Court, Clark County | 10/27/20 | MISC | YES | Nevada | Request for various voter data | Mostly Granted | Trump/GOP | 11/2/20 | Closed | |
In re Enforcement of Election Laws and Securing Ballots Cast or Received After 7:00 P.M. on November 3, 2020, No. SPCV20-00982 (Georgia Superior Court) | 11/04/20 | PROCESS | YES | Georgia | Sequester ballots after election day | Denied – no evidence of law violations | Election Administrators | 11/19/20 | Closed | |
Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (3rd Circuit Court) | 11/09/20 | PROCESS | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Multiple process deficiencies) | Insufficient Evidence | Election Administrators | 11/24/20 | Closed | |
Costantino v. Detroit, No. 355443 (Michigan Court of Appeals) | 11/16/20 | Denied on statutory basis | ||||||||
Costantino v. Detroit, No. 162245 (Michigan Supreme Court) | 11/17/20 | Dismissed – Moot | ||||||||
Pirkle v. Wolf, No. 4:20-cv-02088-MWB (Middle District Pennsylvania) | 11/10/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NA | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Signature Verification Standards; Poll Observer Access) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/16/20 | Closed | |
Bally v. Whitmer, No. 1:20-cv-1088 (Western District Michigan) | 11/11/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NA | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Observer Access) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/16/20 | Closed | |
Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County B of E, No. GD-20-11654 (PA Common Pleas) | 11/12/20 | RULES & PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Failure to write name, address, and date on outer envelope, etc.) | Now at Supreme Court, consolidated with PA “Canvassing” cases above | TBD | 11/23/20 | Consolidated | |
Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County B of E, No. 1162 CD 2020 (PA Common. Ct.) | 11/19/20 | |||||||||
Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County B of E, No. 29 WAP 2020 (PA Supreme Court) | 11/20/20 | |||||||||
Law v. Whitmer, No. 10 OC 00163 1B (Nev. Dist. Ct., Carson City) | 11/17/20 | MACHINE | NO | Nevada | Challenge to Voting Machinery / Hardware / Software: Accepting Invalid Signatures | Denied on statutory basis. (Discovery opposed and not granted.) | Election Administrators | 12/17/20 | Closed | |
Law v. Whitmer, No. 82178 (Nev. Supreme Court) | 12/10/20 | |||||||||
Kelly v. Pennsylvania, No. 620 MD 2020 (PA Commonwealth Court) | 11/21/20 | RULES & PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Legality of No Excuse Absentee voting | Injunction Granted | Trump/GOP | 1/21/21 | Active | |
Kelly v. Pennsylvania, No. No. 68 MAP 2020 (PA Supreme Court) | 11/25/20 | Dismissed – Timeliness (Laches) | Election Administrators | |||||||
Kelly v. Pennsylvania, No. 20A98 / 20-810 (US Supreme Court) | 12/03/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Kistner v. Simon No A20-1486 (Minnesota Supreme Court) | 11/24/20 | PROCESS | NO | Minnesota | Vote by Mail (Ballot harvesting; signature matching; etc.) | Dismissed – Timeliness (Laches) and Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/4/20 | Closed | |
Bailey v. Antrim County (Antrim Michigan Circuit Court) | 11/25/20 | MACHINE | YES | Michigan | Voting machine improperly counted votes | Discovery Granted: TBD | TBD | 11/25/20 | Active | |
Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 2020CV342959 (GA Superior Court, Fulton County) | 11/25/20 | RULES | NO | Georgia | GA should not have accepted a grant | Dismissed – Sovereign Immunity | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/7/20 | Closed | |
Pearson v. Kemp, No. 1:20-cv-04809-TCB (GA Northern District) | 11/25/20 | MACHINE | NO | Georgia | Voting machine irregularities | Dismissed – Jurisdiction | Election Administrators | 1/19/21 | Closed | |
Pearson v. Kemp, No. 20-14480 (11th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 11/25/20 | |||||||||
In Re Pearson v. Kemp, No. 20-816 (US Supreme Court) | 12/03/20 | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | |||||||
King v. Whitmer, No. 2:20-cv-13134 (Eastern District of Michigan) | 11/25/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Poll Observer Access; Ballots were Forged or Altered) | Dismissed – Timeliness (Laches) | Election Administrators | 1/12/21 | Active | |
King v. Whitmer, No. 20-2205 (6th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 12/08/20 | |||||||||
King v. Whitmer, No. 20-815 (US Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Johnson v. Benson, No. 162286 (Michigan Supreme Court) | 11/26/20 | PROCESS | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Other Vote-by-Mail Issue) | Dismissed – Jurisdiction & Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/9/20 | Closed | |
Mueller v. Jacobs, No. 2020AP1958-OA (Wisconsin Supreme Court) | 11/27/20 | RULES | NO | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Ballot drop boxes) | Dismissed – Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/4/20 | Closed | |
Hahn v. Simon, No. 14-CV-20-4033 (Clay County District Court) | 11/30/20 | PROCESS & VOTERS | TBD | Minnesota | Vote-by-Mail (e.g. Poll Observer Access). Voter Irregularities (Duplicate Votes, etc.) | Dismissed – Timeliness & Jurisdiction | Election Administrators | 1/13/21 | Active | |
Hahn v. Keeler, No. A20-1654 (Minnesota Supreme Court) | 1/13/21 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. Superior Court, Maricopa County | 11/30/30 | PROCESS | TBD | Arizona | Vote-by-Mail (e.g. Poll Observer Access, Poll Observer Qualifications, etc.) | No proof of fraud | Election Administrators | 1/12/21 | Active | |
Ward v. Jackson, No. CV-20-0343-AP/EL (Ariz. Supreme Court) | 12/04/20 | |||||||||
Ward v. Jackson, No. 20-809 (US Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
Braun v. Simon (NA) | 12/01/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Minnesota | Alleges statutory violations and irregularities in the post-election review process. | TBD | TBD | 12/13/20 | Active | |
Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, No. 2:20-cv-1771 (E.D. Wis.) | 12/01/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Failure to Include ID Documentation) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing and Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/9/20 | Closed | |
Bowyer v. Ducey, No. 2:20-cv-02321-DJH (District Court of AZ) | 12/02/20 | RULES | NO | Arizona | Authority To Act (Elections Clause, etc.) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/9/20 | Closed | |
Burk v. Ducey, No. CV202001869 (AZ Superior Court, Pinal County) | 12/07/20 | MACHINE | NO | Arizona | Voting machine irregularities | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/6/21 | Closed | |
Burk v. Ducey, No. CV-20-0349-AP/EL (Arizona Supreme Court) | 12/16/20 | |||||||||
Texas v. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia (US Supreme Court) | 12/07/20 | RULES | NO | Various | Violations of State Election Laws | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/15/20 | Closed | |
Still v. Raffensperger, No. 2020CV343711 (GA Superior Court, Fulton Cnty.) | 12/12/20 | RULES | NA | Georgia | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/7/21 | Closed | |
Favorito v. Cooney, No. 2020CV343938 (GA Superior Ct, Fulton Cnty) | 12/28/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Georgia | Improper Ballot Counting | TBD | TBD | 12/28/20 | Active | |
Decisions with Trump not Plaintiff Subtotals = | 48 | 10 | Note: GOP Plaintiff prevailed in 8 out of 10 cases decided on the merits | Trump not plaintiff: Active = | 18 | |||||
Trump/GOP as Defendant: Case Name and Number |
Date Filed | Topic * | Decided on Merits ** | State | Issue(s) | Disposition | Ruling Favored | Date of Last Order | Status | |
Washington v. Trump, No. 1:20-cv-03127 (Eastern District Washington) | 8/17/20 | MISC | YES | DC | Vote-by-Mail (several states vs USPS) | Injunction Granted | Plaintiff | 9/18/20 | Closed | |
Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs, No. 2:20-cv-01903 (Arizona District Court) | 9/30/20 | RULES | YES | Arizona | Objection to State’s voter deadline | Supported on statutory grounds | Trump/GOP | 10/20/20 | Closed | |
Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs, No. 20-16932 (9th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/13/20 | Overturned | ||||||||
Pierson v. Stepien, No. 1:20-cv-09266 (Southern District NY) | 11/04/20 | PROCESS | YES | New York | Recount procedures | Defective claims | Trump/GOP | 11/13/20 | Closed | |
Michigan Welfare Rights Organization v. Trump, No. 1:20-cv-03388 (D.D.C.) | 11/20/20 | RULES | TBD | DC | Trump trying to disenfranchise minorities | TBD | TBD | 12/26/20 | Active | |
Decisions with Trump, et. al. as defendant = | 4 | 3 | Note: GOP Defendant prevailed in 2 out of 3 cases decided on the merits | Trump as defendant: Active = | 1 | |||||
For All 2020 Presidential Election Cases | # of Decisions | Decided on Merits ** | Active Status | |||||||
Grand Totals = | 80 | 21 | Note: Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 14 out of 21 cases decided on the merits | 25 | ||||||
Main References: | *Main Topics are: a) Rules and Regulation legalities or interpretation (e.g. about absentee ballots); b) Process illegalities (officials correcting ballot errors, etc.); | |||||||||
Stanford Healthy Elections Tracker | c) Voter Improprieties (e.g. non-citizens voting, non-registered citizens voting, deceased parties voting, registered voters voting twice, etc.) | |||||||||
Scotusblog Election Litigation Tracker | and/or d) Voting Machine irregularities (e.g. an algorithm changing the actual results, etc.). | |||||||||
Democracy Docket Election Lawsuits | ||||||||||
Brennan Center for Justice | The Totals for each Primary Topic are: Rules = 47; Process = 32; Voter = 3; and Machine = 4. (The total is more than the number of cases, as some cases had more than one Topic.) | |||||||||
Here is the Evidence | ||||||||||
Public Interest Legal Foundation | **Decided on Merits means the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery. | |||||||||
Wikipedia Pre-election 2020 Election Lawsuits | (For example, Discovery might entail an independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the claimed voting malfeasance, impropriety, etc.) | |||||||||
Wikipedia Post-election 2020 Election Lawsuits | For the lawsuits that were voluntarily dismissed, we entered “NA” in the Merits column. For those cases still open, we entered “TBD”. | |||||||||
Note 1: Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference). In each of these situations, the case was not fully heard. | ||||||||||
Note 2: Disposition breakdown of the 80 lawsuits: Non-Merit = 23 (beige); To Be Determined (TBD: active) = 25 (white); Trump Statutory Win = 14 (green); Trump Statutory Loss = 7 (red); Voluntarily withdrawn (due to consolidation, etc.) = 11 (blue). | ||||||||||
Note 3: Since several lawsuits were based on new election regulations (e.g. pertaining to absentee ballots), reportedly due to COVID-19 concerns, this is a list of such changes (by state): | here. | |||||||||
Note 4: One of the several complexities in putting together such a list, is how to handle cases that are appealed. For example, should one case appealed twice be treated as three cases or one? | ||||||||||
The argument for treating them as three cases is due to the facts that: the judges are different, the amount of evidence presented may be different, etc. In our initial versions of this list, we took this approach. | ||||||||||
However, there are downsides to that treatment: it artificially inflates the appearance of actual cases litigated; do we indicate that this is one case open or three? etc. Although either way has merits, we are now counting such situations as one case. | ||||||||||
Note 5: Another complexity is to sort through the multitude of cases filed having to do with 2020 election issues. E.g. the Stanford site (see above) lists 470± such cases (including appeals). We just selected those that directly applied to the Presidential contest. | ||||||||||
That said, we make no claim that this is the entirety of 2020 Presidential election-related cases, but rather those that we were able to find from the several sources cited. If we missed any relevant cases, please send us an email and we will gladly do an update. | ||||||||||
Note 6: Some other 2020 Election Reports by the same team of independent volunteer experts are: | here, | here, | & here. | |||||||
For any questions, suggestions or improvements to this list — or to sign up for our popular, free Energy and Environmental Newsletter: | email physicist John Droz, jr. | |||||||||
Monthly Archives: February 2021
See for Yourself the World of Clones & How You Can Tell the Difference! – Must See Video | Science and Technology | Before It’s News
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
The world of cloning really does exist. People actually believe that humans like Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and Tom Hanks are still alive without realizing that the future is now and that everything they are seeing is a lie.
Everything Wrong With the Capitol Shooting In 21 Minutes Or Less – YouTube
Trump Fires DEEP STATE Legal Team – Real Raw News
Source: Trump Fires DEEP STATE Legal Team – Real Raw News
Donald J. Trump on Saturday fired five attorneys from his impeachment legal team after learning they had ties to the Deep State, Real Raw News has learned. The shocking move comes only a week before Democrats hope to impeach him in Congress, a move that could stop Trump from seeking public office in the future.
Trump’s suspicions of foul play first arose after he overheard a fishy telephone conversation between lead attorney Butch Bowers and an unknown party. On it, Bowers reportedly uttered the words “tic tac doesn’t have a clue what we’re doing,” leading Trump to believe that “tic tac” was an unflattering reference to him. The call, while hardly concrete evidence of deception, prompted Trump to launch an investigation into the lawyers he had hired based on Rudy Giuliani’s recommendation.
When Trump asked the former New York City mayor if he had properly vetted the lawyers, Giuliani told Trump he had conducted a cursory background check but found nothing to suggest that the lawyers would betray their client. However, Giuliani admitted his research was limited to google searches and inquiries to state Bar authorities. Trump wasn’t satisfied.
“Trump’s been betrayed so many times, he trusts no one. He didn’t outright accuse Rudy, his longtime and loyal friend, of wrongdoing, but told him he was going to have someone else dig deep into the lawyers’ backgrounds, just in case he [Rudy] missed something,” said a Mar-a-Lago source familiar with the incident.
On Thursday, January 28, Trump tasked Dan Scavino, a principal loyalist and former White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications, with finding a link between the lawyers and the Deep State. What Giuliani failed to find in a week, Scavino found in a day, a wealth of data linking two of the five lawyers to primary parties seeking to impeach Trump in Congress.
Bowers’s business, Bowers Law Office, for example, had in 2019 contributed $2600 to Utah Senator Mitt Romney’s election campaign. Romney was an outspoken opponent of Trump and often advocated for his premature removal from office. Also linked to the Deep State was Deborah Barbier who, like Bowers, donated cash to Romney’s campaign. Worse, Barbier has working ties to CNN, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, media agencies that have attacked Trump relentlessly ever since he first announced his candidacy.
“Scavino stopped there. The assumption was since the lead attorneys were culpable, then the others probably were too. I understand that Trump met privately with each of them, but I’m not privy to what was said. All I know—all the world knows—is that they parted ways with Trump shortly after,” our source said.
In closing, RRN recognizes that our version of events deviates from a mainstream narrative claiming that the attorneys and Trump parted amicably over differences in defense strategies. We also acknowledge that it is atypical of Trump, a boisterous, flamboyant, and unfiltered man, to refrain from publicly bashing persons he considers traitorous. But sources we deem credible claim that Trump is now holding his cards close to his chest, as they say, and will soon play his ace in the hole.
GOP TRAITORS PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO BIDEN, NEW WORLD ORDER – Always remember that Telling lies is a major part of politics under biden
Source: GOP TRAITORS PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO BIDEN, NEW WORLD ORDER – Real Raw News
Ten Republican Senators on Monday visited Biden at the White House in hopes of convincing the fledgling president to trim a 1.9 trillion-dollar Covid-19 relief package—the stated reason for the visit. But upon arriving at the White House, they found that Biden had an ulterior agenda that had little to do with the disease. He wanted to ascertain whether Republican Senators still embraced Donald Trump.
Among the ten Republicans in attendance were:
Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who denounced Trump’s claims of election fraud;
Susan Collins of Maine, whose tumultuous relationship with her own party often saw her reaching across the aisle;
Jerry Moran of Kansas, whose ninth inning pledge to support Biden’s Electoral College victory angered Trump;
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, the first GOP Senator to call for Trump’s ousting in the wake of the 6 Jan riots;
Rob Portman of Ohio, who has infuriated his party for criticizing freshman Representative Marjorie Taylor-Green; and, last but not least,
Utah Senator Mitt Romney, whose feud with Trump needs no expanding on.
After a brief public discourse, they and four other Republican Senators secluded themselves in the Oval Office for a two-hour, closed-door conversation with Biden and Harris. Of the ten Senators present, one, who shall remain nameless, had the courage to leak the true nature of the meeting. We present a summary of the gathering.
After a fifteen-minute debate on Biden’s nearly two trillion-dollar relief package, Biden smirked, said his Covid-19 deal was non-negotiable, and told everyone present that he expected unwavering support in abolishing Trump’s “misdeeds” and rebuilding America into a country the rest of the world could be proud of.
“Trump is a relic, a thing of the past, an anachronism,” Joe Biden said, sounding more like Obama than himself. “His medieval, cold war-era thinking has not only irreparably damaged our nation, but it’s also damaged our relations with the rest of the world. And just so you all know, Mitch [McConnell] is with me,” Biden said slowly.
Biden often paused between words, as if trying to regain a train of thought. He reportedly had a small earpiece in his right ear and seemed to receive instructions from an unseen party.
Biden admitted to the senators that Trump still had hopes of invalidating the election and returning to the White house,
that he was fabricating evidence to present to the American people.
Any such proof, Biden said, was a concoction of Trump’s diseased mind.
“I understand many of you, as do your colleagues not here today, still harbor misplaced loyalty to Trump. That ends today. I’m not asking you to forsake the Republican Party or its values. See, Trump subverted the Republican Party and brainwashed a lot of people. Today begins the deprogramming. Look, you can have very comfortable political careers or uncomfortable careers,” Biden said.
“Gentlemen, we’re here to fix the problem, and we’re politely asking for your help,” Kamala Harris chimed in. “We could ask not so politely.”
Biden said that Trump’s mishandling of US-China relations had almost pushed the two superpowers to the brink of nuclear war, adding that had Trump won the 2020 election, both countries—and the rest of the world—would have been engulfed in an atomic fireball.
“I fixed in a day the damage he caused over four years,” Biden said. “The world can sleep easier.”
Until that point in the meeting, the ten Republicans had sat quietly and listened, some stone-faced, some with mouths agape, and some nodding in silent agreement.
Kansas Senator Jerry Moran was the first to speak up: “How exactly did you do that?”
Biden’s toothy smile turned suddenly to a frown, and his face darkened. The specifics, he said, were not important. “If concessions are made, they’re made in furthering the benefit of a new world structure in which the United states cooperates with, not antagonizes, the rest of the world. If there’s a chance Trump might at some point, be it tomorrow or 2024, regain power, there is a danger to humankind. None of you are strangers to his damage,” Biden said.
Mitt Romney, who had been silent, stood, raised his right hand, and pledged allegiance to Biden’s vision of a new and prosperous America.
“You’re the president, Mr. President, and I do solemnly swear to support you, your meritorious values, and your mission to restore America,” Romney said.
“What about the rest of you?” Biden said.
Romney reportedly looked at them with a coaxing smile. Most hands sprang up; a few lifted hesitantly. But in unanimous accord they parroted Romney’s words, condemning Donald Trump and applauding Joe Biden.
Biden adjourned the discussion after saying he expected them to “exert influence” on Senate partners and instructed them not to disclose particulars of the meeting unless later authorized to do so.
“Remember what we talked about here today: Covid-19,” Biden said.
Trump Assassination Foiled, Deep State in Panic Mode! – Real Raw News
Source: Trump Assassination Foiled, Deep State in Panic Mode! – Real Raw News
A confidential source within Trump’s inner circle told Real Raw News that Trump was asleep in bed, and, a light sleeper, was awakened by the “sharp crack” of the bullet striking glass. The round did not penetrate the glass, but caused a material-science dissipation fracture, or spiderweb pattern.
The strike, our source said, triggered a silent alarm that instantly notified the Palm Beach Police Dept. and Trump’s Secret Service Detail, which sleeps in a guest house ten yards from the main building. Agents whisked Trump to safety, escorting him to a fortified saferoom, and said they’d coordinate with local authorities.
But Trump demanded they call the Palm Beach Police Dept. and say it was a false alarm.
“Trump was adamant no police get involved,” our source said. “He told his guys he wants to keep it in the family. No law enforcement. No media. He was very stern about keeping the media blind to the event. Trump made a phone call, and inside of thirty minutes, some heavy-hitting dudes who were definitely not Secret Service arrived at the estate,” our source said.
With Trump safe, his private security fanned across the 20-acre estate searching for signs of intrusion, while the Secret Service detail began its own investigation as to how a would-be assassin got within shooting distance of one of the most secure residences in the world.
At 7:00am a forensic ballistic expert from Quantico arrived at Mar-a-Lago and determined the bullet fragments were from a 7mm Remington Magnum round. He found himself amid an intractable dilemma, our source said. The round had been fired at a downward angle and, had it pierced glass, would have sizzled through Trump’s skull, but an attack on the east window meant one of two things. The sniper had taken the shot from either estate grounds, which lacks elevated terrain, or from somewhere above the Atlantic swell, a seemingly impossible feat.
“Trump’s bedroom is 23 feet above ground level. Besides the main building, no structure on the property is higher. The ballistics guy figured the shot could only have been made by someone in a hovering helicopter two hundred yards or more off the coast. If true, that guy must have been the best marksman in the world. From a helicopter and at night. Crazy,” our source said.
The concept of sniping from a helicopter seemed so unrealistic that RRL reached out to Marine Corps Staff Sgt. Hunter Bernius, a scout-sniper and instructor at the Marine Corps. School of Infantry in Geiger, North Carolina. Without mentioning the nature of our inquiry, we asked Staff Sgt. Bernius about the odds of successfully pulling off a 200-400 yard shot from a hovering chopper with little or no natural light.
“Only with proper training specifically for that type of mission. To shoot precisely, the shooter has to account for aircraft vibration and wind speed and direction, all wind whipping up around him from blades spinning at 400rpm. Then there’s a dozen other variables. Takes months and months of training from a qualified instructor, and there’s still no guarantee. Aerial sniping is a skill all its own,” Staff Sgt. Bernius said.
By noon, the Secret Service had discretely interviewed all persons on estate property, but no one reported having seen or heard a helicopter.
According to our source, Trump’s people suspected the attack was carried out by the Deep State, to stop Trump from amassing incriminating evidence that, if released, could sink every Democrat from Joe Biden to the most junior member of the Democratic caucus.
(For those people asking What about Melania? Where was Melania? Anyone who knows anything about the Trumps, knows they sleep in separate bedrooms.)
This is a developing story.
IG Farben: the roots of the COVID plan « Jon Rappoport’s Blog
Source: IG Farben: the roots of the COVID plan « Jon Rappoport’s Blog
by Jon Rappoport
January 4, 2021
Knowledge of an ongoing crime inside a corporation turns into a conspiracy of silence, shared by many employees…
But as you travel up the corporate ladder, SOMEONE not only knows, but INTENDS to keep committing the crime.
This is my conclusion, after 30 years of investigating criminal medical behavior, including mass murder.
Here is deep background, which illuminates the current pharmaceutical lead role in the COVID fraud and devastation:
In 1933, the largest cartel in the world, IG Farben, enabled Hitler’s rise to power. Farben: pharmaceuticals, dyes, chemicals, synthetics.
During WW2, Farben had prisoners shipped from Auschwitz to its nearby facility, where horrendous medical/pharmaceutical experiments were carried out on them.
For accounts, read The Devil’s Chemists, by Josiah DuBois, and The Crime and Punishment of IG Farben, by Joseph Borkin.
At the end of the War, Farben executives were put on trial and, despite the efforts of Telford Taylor, the chief US prosecutor, and assistant prosecutor, Josiah DuBois, the sentences handed out were light.
For example, Fritz Ter Meer, a high-ranking Farben executive, was tried for mass medical murder and slavery, and sentenced to a paltry seven years in jail. He was released after three years, and went on to occupy a post as chairman of the advisory board of Bayer, a “branch on the tree” of IG Farben.
There were clear reasons for light sentences for Farben executives. One, the rebuilding of Europe was seen as a bulwark against aggressive Soviet Communism. Farben war criminals were “needed” to organize the new Europe.
More important, a whole new world was coming into being, and mega-corporations and cartels were at the heart of it. They would be the engines driving the global economy and controlling the natural resources of the planet. It was colonialism with a different face, the East India Company running on technology and industry and a planetary reach beyond anything ever attempted.
So the Farben moguls, and those like them, were seen by many as highly competent designers of the new “peace and prosperity.”
And oh yes—there was a third reason the Farben executives got off so lightly. Their powerful cartel partners all over the world wanted to continue profitable relationships with these Nazi brethren.
A few of the highly influential international partners: Dow, DuPont, imperial Chemical Industries, and, most importantly, the Rockefeller Empire.
You could say that, after the War, the emerging global pharmaceutical colossus was a reincarnation of the Farben pattern:
Profit before safety; lethal medical experimentation beyond any legal limit; the use of drugs/vaccines as a means of control.
That m.o. has survived to this day, and it has prospered beyond predictions. It has also damaged, destroyed, and killed far more people than Nazi Farben dreamed of.
I have often cited Dr. Barbara Starfield’s July 26, 2000, review in the Journal of the American Medical Association, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”
Starfield conservatively stated that every year, the US medical system kills 106,000 people by direct administration of FDA approved medical drugs.
This turns into more than a million deaths per decade. And we aren’t even talking about the millions more who are severely maimed. Nor are vaccines part of this estimate.
The horrific medical program is a direct continuation of the IG Farben plan.
And now we have the fraud called COVID-19. The killing—of the frail and elderly—comes through the terrifying diagnosis of the “pandemic disease,” plus the forced isolation from family and love ones. No virus necessary.
The maiming and killing also comes with the administration of the favored toxic drug, Remdesivir, and the use of breathing ventilators plus sedation. In one large New York study, the death rate among elderly patients placed on ventilators was a staggering 97.2 percent.
Medically justified COVID lockdown-imprisonments have devastated millions of lives.
This captive audience is now being subjected to the largest medical experiment in history: the administration of a vaccine that was rushed through approval, and deploys an RNA technology never approved for public use before—owing to its dangers.
The main benefit of this vaccine accrues to the modern Farben nexus of pharmaceutical companies: RNA technology, finally approved, allows much faster, easier, and cheaper production of vaccines and drugs.
Thus, researchers can claim to discover dozens of “new viruses” that require vaccines. From testing to mass vaccine production—a matter of a few months, not years.
Serious adverse reactions to the new COVID vaccines are piling up—at last count, a reported 3% of those who received the shots. You can EASILY multiply that by a factor of ten to gain a more accurate picture.
Public health officials and government leaders will write these reactions off as “COVID disease” and keep on promoting the experimental vaccine—and they’ll warn that widespread refusal to take the shots will bring on the need for new levels of incarceration-lockdowns.
This entire program of destruction—from WW2 onward—actually from 1910 and the infamous Flexner Report—has been aimed at weakening populations, making them easier to control.
This entire program has been intentional, at the highest levels.
The ongoing administration of the program has essentially been carried out by the ignorant, the blind, the brainwashed, the cowardly—who form a vast faceless bureaucracy that resembles the Nazi machine-structure; “I was only following orders.”
But again, at the highest levels, it is intentional.
War by other means.
Out Of Shadows, Fall Cabal, Pizzagate, Child Abuse, Hollyweird, Slavery, Human Trafficking…
Source: Out Of Shadows, Fall Cabal, Pizzagate, Child Abuse, Hollyweird, Slavery, Human Trafficking…
Out Of Shadows, Fall Cabal, Pizzagate, Child Abuse, Hollyweird, Slavery, Human Trafficking…
We’re Not Gonna Take It – STOP THE STEAL
Source: We’re Not Gonna Take It – STOP THE STEAL
A little motivation to keep the fight alive.
WOW! 1 million views!
It’s amazing to see so many patriotic Americans watching this!
To those who think this was made as a call for riots and violence, I ask, did you watch the video?
If riots and violence are what you got from this, you missed the mark completely. This video is anti-riots, anti-violence.
It’s about The American People peacefully assembling, standing against violence and chaos, respecting our flag, standing for freedom. Standing behind the only person who dared to brave DC and shine a light on the swamp that it’s become. The video pays homage to all Americans who stand by our President, who will not abandon him to fight for this country alone.
It’s a reminder to the powers that be that the American spirit can only take so much before action is required. The American People are sick of the lies, disinformation, manipulation, censorship, corruption, hypocrisy, greed, and tyranny that is a pandemic of its own.
There are powerful people willing to let this country burn to the ground to hide their true intentions and corruption, BUT Patriotic Americans are the Yin to their Yang.
We THE PEOPLE are fed up. This isn’t about right or left. That’s what THEY want you to think, to distract you, to keep you from opening your eyes. THIS is simply about freedom VS captivity.
The video is a reminder of how much can be accomplished if we stand United as we fight to preserve our freedoms. A flame to ignite whatever spark you need to keep going, to keep speaking out, to keep talking, to break the barriers of misunderstanding, and more importantly to keep defending our Constitutional Rights and Freedoms.
“We’re Not Gonna Take It!” We are stubborn Americans and will not be pushed around any longer.
We love our GREAT COUNTRY and will stand to defend our FREEDOMS like so many brave Americans before us.
That’s what THE VIDEO is about.
I’m just an everyday Patriotic American trying to make a difference who made a video to the greatest Twisted Sister song ever written, and thanks to Q was lucky enough to get an audience.
The best audience ever, thank you for being a part of this.
WWG1WGA