Source: You Must See This Memo Sent To Biden! They Label YOU Enemy #1 & They Intend To Eradicate Religion!
Absolute Proof – The Mike Lindell Bombshell Evidence of Election Rigging and Who, How and When it Was Done.
Source: Brighteon
Absolute Proof – the Mike Lindell bombshell evidence of election rigging.
All the state fraud evidence is shown in detail, which also shows’ China electronic hacking of the American election equipment systems. To see the NEW evidence of “absolute proof” of vote fraud, fast forward to 1 hour, 36 minutes, of the new Mike Lindell video:
Ann Delap: Cabal Video Series Parts 1-10 with Summaries — JFK Jr. Alive Free Energy Human Trafficking Satanic Rituals Media Manipulation Dawn of a New World – Public Intelligence Blog
General Overview
This is the BEST red pill documentary expose̒ of the ugly truths about our world and the people who run it I have seen in a while. The narrator includes a lot of information in ten relatively short episodes and offers insight into the QAnon movement. Mind-blowing information for the uninitiated and some surprises even for those familiar with the topic! Alert Reader has provided summaries of all available videos.
The follow-on series can be viewed here.
PART 1
Part 1 – The End of the World as We Know It
The narrator opens with inconvenient truths about the recent wildfires in California, mercury in vaccines, chemtrails, organ harvesting, reptilian and satanic symbols in Vatican buildings, 911, false flag victims and subliminal messages in children’s entertainment. If that isn’t enough, she goes on to expose man-made viruses, cell phones and TVs that spy on us and the poisoning of our food supply by Monsanto/Bayer. What do all of these have in common? They are completely ignored by the mainstream media.
PART 2
Part 2 – Down the Rabbit Hole
This episode traces the beginnings of the QAnon movement with examples of cryptic posts and phrases revealing secret societies and political corruption. The involvement of the Rothschild and Rockefeller families in banking, the Federal Reserve and the control of conventional medicine is discussed. George Soros’ connections to NAMBLA and ANTIFA are revealed.
PART 3
Part 3 – The Alien Invasion
The truth about the “migrant invasion” and its connection to George Soros is exposed. Narrator explains how MSM twisted facts to make Trump look bad, ignoring his efforts to combat human trafficking.
PART 4
Part 4 – Childlovers Everywhere
This episode delves into the Haitian orphanage child trafficking scandal involving the Clinton Foundation and the misuse of charitable donations by groups like Oxfam and the Red Cross. It reveals pedophile symbolism used by organizations dedicated to “helping children” and their connection to high profile politicians. It also exposes the Hollywood connection to pedophilia and the rampant sexual abuse of children including child actors. A real eye opener.
PART 5 (BITCHUTE)
Part 5 — Children, Art, & Pizza
Sexualization of children and normalization of paedophilia, lowering the age of consent by judges and politicians like Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Theresa May amongst others. Paedophile logos used in advertisement, (Disney)films and cartoons, Child Protection Services, Adoption Agencies, in Politics etc. Pizagate, Comet Pingpong, sickening art and James Achilles Alefantes (a Rothschild) and his friends.
PART 6
Part 6 – Major Media Manipulation
This episode discusses the extent of fake news and propaganda being disseminated by the major news organizations, who owns them and why choice is an illusion. It reveals how disinformation is used to drum up support for wars, shape our perceptions of people and events and promote a narrative. Events that do not support that narrative are simply never reported. Snopes is also exposed as a fraud.
PART 7
Part 7 – Witches & Warlocks
The relationship of controversial artists like Maria Abramovic (known for “spirit cooking”) to high profile figures is discussed, along with satanic symbols in art and entertainment. Cannibalism is a recurrent theme. The suspicious suicides of musicians and celebrities who were victims of “death by hanging from a doorknob”, including Kate Spade and Anthony Bourdain are examined. The rest of the video is devoted to the Dutch and British royal families and their connections to known pedophiles and Nazis.
PART 8
Part 8 – Beyond Kings & Queens
This episode delves into the dark side of pedophilia, exposing cults who engage in satanic ritual abuse and the murder of children for adrenochrome. It also investigates the association of the British royal family, the Pope and celebrities with these groups. Red shoes anyone? How about the genocide of 50,000 native Canadian children?
PART 9
Part 9 – The Dawn of a New World
The rise of populist movements around the world like the Yellow Vests and QAnon are examined. While the public is becoming aware of the existence of sex cults like NXIVM, other scandals like the Rosatom affair involving the Clintons are being covered up. Get ready for some bombshells about Obama, John McCain, the Dalai Lama and the true identity of Osama bin Laden.
PART 10
Part 10 – The Return of the King
The final episode is a hopeful one. It promotes the theory that JFK Jr. is still very much alive and working with Donald Trump through Q to rid the world of the cabal that killed his father. The narrator drops some tantalizing clues involving a George magazine cover and books by Ingersoll Lockwood. Who is the mysterious Vincent Fusca? Can we really go back in time? The narrator proposes that we are on the verge of a new paradigm, a beautiful new world of free energy, a new banking system and new medical system. Can it be true? I pray it is so.
Mongoose: Unverified Very Possibly True We Pray This Be So, 5 UPDATES – Public Intelligence Blog
Source: Mongoose: Unverified Very Possibly True We Pray This Be So, 5 UPDATES – Public Intelligence Blog
Alert Reader says: A friend forwarded this info to me. It comes from a blogger in Belgium named Mike Doms. The text was originally in French, so I used translate.google for English:
The official announcement of martial law and legitimate military government, in place since 12 a.m. on January 20, 2021, was made on Friday January 29 at 6 p.m. EST (11 p.m. GMT). The official announcement of the arrest of Biden as well as 355 Congressmen and 109 Senators (or 464 elected) on January 24 and 25 was made on Sunday, January 31 at 4:35 p.m. EST (10:35 p.m. GMT).
These announcements were communicated on the above dates and times to all American media (television, radio and national newspapers) as well as to all world press agencies. As expected by the legitimate military government governing America as well as Trump and Qforce this official news has been 100% censored by all of the world’s official media.
The US military government knew it and wanted it. As with Biden’s and his party’s coup, the legitimate US government allows the US media to commit the act of high treason of censoring official communications from the legitimate government regarding measures of national security and immediate danger to the nation. American nation.
The Illuminati media of the 4th Reich all fell into the trap.
From now on the legitimate military government can take (provisional) control of all these media guilty of terrorism whenever it wishes, as provided for by the laws and the American constitution.
The US military government will take control (by force) of ALL of the official media (radio, television, newspapers) on Friday February 5 at 6.30 p.m. EST (11 p.m. GMT or midnight in France) exactly on all American territory.
This includes taking control of all American channels on direct broadcast satellites broadcasting in France and Europe. This also means that all French and Europeans with a satellite reception antenna receiving American channels can no longer be censored and will therefore learn the truth from Friday evening.
Among other things, the American army will broadcast by force on all these American mass media the revelations on Biden’s coup d’état, on his arrest with elected officials on Sunday January 24 and Monday January 25 …
Finally, on February 12, the government American military will officially publish (evidence submitted to all world governments and the international press) all the evidence of the plot perpetrated by the French government and China to create a false global epidemic to overthrow the American government. This by ruining its economy by destroying the entire world economy. It is an act of war which gives among other things the legitimate right to the American government to overthrow the Macron government.
Phi Beta Iota: The above is not verified. We are waiting to hear from Juan O. Savin (P) and have inquired of two others sources. This feels plausible as well as necessary if America is to survive and prosper. We note with interest that 15 February is Presidents’ Day, an epic day on which to announce plans for the re-inauguration of our rightful lawfully elected President Donald Trump on 4 March 2021 at midnight.
UPDATE 1: Alert Reader
I don’t doubt the validity of the Mongoose assertions. This will play out eventually. I am uncomfortable with the date predictions, though. We’ve all been jacked-off enough by this. I think that dates are leaked out to get the DS to expend ammo.
I personally believe that this unfolds after the Superbowl. The Q drops make references about certain events making “the Superbowl look like a puppy show.” PBI: Superbowl is 7 February, above tracks for week after.
Also picking up in a couple of other spots that the remaining CCP is being dismantled. Furthermore, the US and China will step-in, occupy, and help to establish a transitional government of the Republic of China. This seems to be an extension of Fuilford’s update yesterday. While this is an exciting (bordering sensational) thought, it seems far-fetched even for civilian dreamers. I cannot envision a country with 1.4 billion people and an active military of 2 million welcoming the Tiawanese and Americans with open arms. Five-D thoughts are great, but we’re not there yet.
UPDATE 2: Video
BitChute Link for Descrription, Embed Code, Full-Screen Viewing, & Sharing
UPDATE 3: Military Intelligence Retired Big Dog says:
Watch this. Posting by Hyten adds to the plausibility of the report…..
BitChute Link for Description, Embed Code, Full-Screen Viewing, & Sharing
UPDATE 4: Video with Dr. Charlie, Simon, Sacha
BitChute Linkfor Description, Embed Code, Full-Screen Viewing, & Sharing
UPDATE 5: Alert Reader comments.
Wow that is pretty spectaculair news and incredibly specific.
I doubt this to be true, as the real plan is not being leaked. We have seen it before, the jan 20 date was a very big thing but did not manifest, it was disinfo and misdirection to keep everyone in the dark. It has also appeared that inaction was the plan all along to complete the crime.
On the other hand, this reads like everything is already complete so they can break some cover now. I also read somewhere that lots of Rothschilds and financial people are being taken out and jumping off of buildings all of a sudden due to the reddit events.
Justin Deschamps at Stillness in the Storm has published this:
Lists of High-Profile Deaths: January 2021
I take a hopeful approach of wait and see.
UK Vaccine Minister: All Over Age 50 Must Be Vaccinated Before Lockdown Lift Begins
Source: UK Vaccine Minister: All Over Age 50 Must Be Vaccinated Before Lockdown Lift Begins
By PFW News
UK Vaccine Minister Nadhim Zahawi says that lockdown restrictions will not be lifted until all over the age 50 receive the COVID-19 vaccine, a decision he claims could push the return to normalcy into the summer.
Zahawi, the top bureaucrat over the country’s vaccine roll out, clarified when speaking to The Sun on Tuesday that the government ideally wants to see the top 9 age categories vaccinated in the first phase of dose administration, which includes everyone over 50.
“Is your message to the country and to your own back benches, forget mid-February, forget the 8th of March … not until we’ve done everybody over the age of 50 can we can we really talk about getting back to life, anything like normal?” a radio host with The Sun asked Zahawi, to which the Minister responded …
We’ll do that as quickly as possible … the prime minster has made it very clear that on the 22nd of February there will be a road map for how we intend to reopen the economy, beginning with schools on the 8th of March and then gradually the rest of the economy.
Zahawi would insist that the UK is on pace to have jabbed nearly everyone in the most Covid vulnerable group – those over 70 – within the next 11 days.
Despite this group accounting for the vast majority of Covid deaths, the Minister claims this is still not enough to lift freedom crushing restrictions.
“We want to reopen schools, reopen our economy, get our lives back, but never have to go back into another severe lockdown like the one we’re all experiencing and suffering from at the moment,” he said.
The Vaccine Minister would espouse a slow moving method to lifting lockdown measures that relies heavily on data.
You’ve got to make sure that your vaccination program has protected the top nine categories in phase one – that is 99% of mortality.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced during a Tuesday Downing Street press conference that there would indeed be a road map for exiting lockdown presented on February 22.
The people of England are currently strapped under harsh lockdown rules that restrict them from being social with anyone outside their home or “support bubble” without a government-approved “reasonable excuse.”
People breaking these rules can face fines, including an £800 penalty for those attending house parties of more than 15 people and a £10,000 fine for the organizers, reports BBC News.
Source: Planet Free Will
Mike Lindell – Absolute Proof Of Voter Fraud
2020 Presidential Election Lawsuits Related to Election Integrity
| 2020 Presidential Election Lawsuits Related to Election Integrity | (Public Version 2-5-21) | (Note: the list is sorted chronologically) | ||||||||
| Trump as Plaintiff: Case Name and Number |
Date Filed | Topic * | Decided on Merits ** | State | Issue(s) | Disposition | Ruling Favored | Date of Last Order | Status | |
| Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Boockvar, No. 2:20-cv-00966 (Western D PA) | 6/29/20 | PROCESS | NO | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes; Witness and/or Notary Requirement; Failure to include ID/Doc. etc.) | Dismissed – Lack Standing on federal claims; Other claims did not have a statutory basis | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/10/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Cegavske, No. 2:20-cv-01445 (District NV) | 8/04/20 | RULES | NO | Nevada | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing and Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/22/20 | Closed | |
| RNC v. Miller, No. 06571 EQCV095986 (Iowa District Court, Linn County) | 8/10/20 | RULES | YES | Iowa | Vote-by-Mail (pre-populating ballots should not be allowed) | Granted Injunction. Iowa counties were told to send blank ballots | Trump/GOP | 12/20/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Murphy, No. 3:20-cv-10753 (District NJ) | 8/19/20 | RULES | NO | New Jersey | Governor mandates all votes to be by mail | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/22/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President et al v. Bullock et al, No. 6:20-cv-00066 (D. Mont.) | 9/02/20 | RULES | TBD | Montana | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that the Governor exceeded his authority, etc.) | Consolidated with Lamm case | TBD | 9/30/20 | Consolidated | |
| Monmouth County Republican Committee v. Way, No. 3:20-cv-13914 (District Court of NJ) & No. MON-L-003019-20 (NJ Superior Court, Monmouth County) | 9/24/20 | RULES | NO | New Jersey | Various absentee ballot issues | Consolidated with Murphy case | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/20/20 | Consolidated | |
| Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Philadelphia County Board of Elections, No. 200902035 (PA Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 10/01/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | Poll observers were not allowed at early voting locations | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 10/23/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Philadelphia County, No. 983 CD 2020 (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court) | 10/15/20 | |||||||||
| In re November 3, 2020 Gen. Election, No. 149 MM 2020 (Penn. Supreme Court) | 10/04/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Signature Verification | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 12/21/20 | Active | |
| Trump v. Boockvar, No. 20- (US Supreme Court) | 12/20/20 | Vote-by-Mail (Poll Observer Access; Signature Verification Standards; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | TBD | TBD | ||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Simon, No. A20-1362 (Minn. Supreme Court) | 10/28/20 | RULES | YES | Minnesota | Vote-by-Mail (Mail Voting Deadlines [for Applying, Receiving, Postmark]) | Granted Injunction. Sequestration of late ballots | Trump/GOP | 10/29/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Gloria, No. A-20-824153-C (NV District Court) | 11/03/20 | RULES | YES | Nevada | Requested voting time extension | Granted. Extended poll hours. | Trump/GOP | 11/3/20 | Closed | |
| In Re: Canvassing Observation, No. 7003 (PA Ct. Common Pleas, Phil. Cnty) | 11/03/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Poll observers do not have sufficient proximity to canvassing. | Denied – Poll observer access | Election Administrators | 1/11/21 | Active | |
| In Re: Canvassing Observation, No. 1094 CD 2020 (PA Commonwealth Ct) | 11/04/20 | Appeal Granted – Poll observer access | Trump/GOP | |||||||
| In Re: Canvassing Observation, No. 30 EAP 2020 (Penn. Supreme Court) | 11/05/20 | Reversed | Election Administrators | |||||||
| Trump v. Boockvar, No. 30 EAP 2020 (US Supreme Court) | 12/20/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Benson, No. 20-000225-MZ (MI Court of Claims) | 11/04/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Drop Boxes/Drop Off Locations; Poll Observer Access) | Dismissed – Lacked Timeliness; Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/11/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Benson, No. 355378 (MI Appeals Court) | 11/30/20 | |||||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Benson, No. 162320 (MI Supreme Court) | 12/17/20 | |||||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Kathy Boockvar, et al., No. 602 MD 2020 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania) | 11/04/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Sec of State can not allow ID proof to be delayed by several days) | Granted Injunction. Late ballots without ID not counted. | Trump/GOP | 11/12/20 | Closed | |
| In re Enforcement of Election Laws and Securing Ballots Cast or Received After 7:00 P.M. on November 3, 2020, No. SPCV20-00982 (GA Superior Court) | 11/04/20 | RULES | YES | Georgia | Sequestration of Absentee Ballots submitted after Election Day | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 11/5/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Philadelphia Cnty. Bd. of Elections, No. 2:20-cv-05533-PD (Eastern District Court Pennsylvania) | 11/05/20 | PROCESS | NA | Pennsylvania | Poll observers at early voting locations | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/5/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of Elections… | 11/05/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | No addresses on 600± absentee ballots | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 11/13/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Hobbs, No. CV2020-014248 (AZ Super) | 11/07/20 | PROCESS | NO | Arizona | Cancelled votes | Dismissed – Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/16/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Boockvar, No. 4:20-cv-02078 (M.D. PA) | 11/09/20 | RULES | NO | Pennsylvania | Insufficient poll watching of absentee ballots, etc. | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/27/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for Pres., Inc. v. Boockvar, No. 20-3371 (3rd Circuit) | 11/22/20 | |||||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, No. 20-3371 (3rd Cir Appeals) | 11/23/20 | Appellants seek review of the district court for denying their Motion to Amend … | ||||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Board of Elections, No. 20-05786-35 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County) | 11/09/20 | PROCESS | YES | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail Issue: 2177 Ballots were objected to for various reasons — e.g. unsigned, etc. It then came down to 69 ballots received in unsealed envelopes. | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 12/8/20 | Closed | |
| Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Board of Elections, No. 1191 PA Commonwealth Court 2020 | 11/20/20 | |||||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Board of Elections, Nos. 174/676 MAL 2020 (PA Supreme Court) | 11/21/20 | |||||||||
| In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020 General Election, No. 20110894 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail Issues (Poll Observer Access; Signature Verification Standards; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | Denied – Interpretation of Election Code (voter did not print name nor include street address) | Election Administrators | 12/20/20 | Active | |
| ” ” ” ” No. 20110895 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
| ” ” ” ” No. 20110896 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
| ” ” ” ” No. 20110897 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
| ” ” ” ” No. 20110898 (Penn. Ct. Common Pleas, Philadelphia County) | 11/10/20 | |||||||||
| ” ” ” ” No. 31 EAP 2020 | 11/18/20 | |||||||||
| Trump v. Boockvar, Nos. 31 EAP 2020, 32 EAP 2020, 33 EAP 2020, 34 EAP 2020, 35 EAP 2020, 29 WAP 2020 (US Supreme Court) | 12/20/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Benson, No. 1:20-cv-01083 (W.D. Mich.) | 11/11/20 | PROCESS | NA | Michigan | For Wayne County not to certify their results | Voluntarily Withdrawn | Trump/GOP: Wayne County votes not certified | 11/19/20 | Closed | |
| Lin Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG (North District Georgia) | 11/13/20 | RULES | NO | Georgia | State allowed procedures that are different from the Georgia Election Code | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/17/20 | Active | |
| Lin Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 20-14418 (11th Circuit) | 11/24/20 | |||||||||
| Lin Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 20-799 (US Supreme Court) | 12/08/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Trump v. Evers, No. 2020AP1971-OA (Wisconsin Supreme Court) | 12/01/20 | PROCESS | NO | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | Dismissed – Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/3/20 | Closed | |
| Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commissions, No. 2:20-cv-01785 (E.D. Wis.) | 12/02/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Denied: Moot; Statutes not violated. | Election Administrators | 1/11/21 | Active | |
| Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commissions, No. 20-3414 (7th Circuit Court) | 12/12/20 | Authority To Act (Electors Clause) | Denied: Laches; Statutes not violated | |||||||
| Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commissions, No. 20-883 (US Supreme Court) | 12/30/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Trump v. Biden, No. 2020CV007092 (WI Superior Court, Milwaukee County) | 12/03/20 | RULES & PROCESS | TBD | Wisconsin | Recount; Illegal Ballots Cast | Court affirmed recount | Election Administrators | 1/11/21 | Active | |
| Trump v. Biden, No. 2020AP2038 (Wisconsin Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | Illegal Ballots Cast | Denied: Laches; Statutes not violated | |||||||
| Trump v. Biden, No. 20-882 (US Supreme Court) | 12/29/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Trump v. Raffensperger, No. 2020CV343255 (GA Superior Court, Fulton County) | 12/04/20 | RULES | NA | Georgia | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/7/21 | Closed | |
| Trump v. Raffensperger, No. S21M0561 (Georgia Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | Authority To Act (Other) | Dismissed – Jurisdiction | |||||||
| Trump v. Toulouse Oliver, No. 1:20-cv-01289 (District Court, New Mexico) | 12/14/20 | PROCESS | NO | New Mexico | Vote-by-Mail (Drop Boxes/Drop Off Locations) | Voluntarily Withdrawn | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/15/20 | Closed | |
| Trump v. Kemp, 1:20-cv-05310-MHC (North District Georgia) | 12/31/20 | RULES | NO | Georgia | Authority To Act (Electors Clause) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/5/21 | Closed | |
| Decisions with Trump as Plaintiff Subtotals = | 28 | 8 | Note: Trump prevailed in 4 out of 8 cases decided on the merits | Trump as Plaintiff: Active = | 6 | |||||
| Election Integrity Cases where Trump was not Plaintiff: Case Name and Number |
Date Filed | Topic * | Decided on Merits ** | State | Issue(s) | Disposition | Ruling Favored | Date of Last Order | Status | |
| Curtin v. VA State Bd. of Elections, No. 1:20-cv-00546 (E.D. Virginia) | 5/13/20 | RULES | NO | Virginia | Absentee ballots increases voter fraud | Dismissed – Laches | Case Not Fully Heard | 9/7/20 | Closed | |
| Ritchie v. Polis, No. 2020CV31708 (Colorado District Court, Denver) | 5/18/20 | RULES | YES | Colorado | Objected to the Governor being able to change some of the Vote-by-Mail rules. | Denied on statutory basis | Election Administrators | 9/1/20 | Closed | |
| Ritchie v. Polis, No. 20CA983 (Colorado Court Appeals) | 6/01/20 | |||||||||
| Ritchie v. Polis, No. 20SC453 (Colorado Supreme Court) | 6/10/20 | Overturned | Trump/GOP | |||||||
| Davis v. Benson, No. 20-000099-MM (MI Court of Claims) | 5/28/20 | RULES | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Other Vote-by-Mail Issue) [Consolidated with Black v. Benson and Cooper-Keel v. Benson.] | Denied on statutory basis, as Plaintiff did not show irreparable harm, etc. | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/6/20 | Active | |
| Davis v. Benson, No. 1:20-cv-00768 (MI Western District Court) | 8/13/20 | |||||||||
| Davis v. Benson, No. 354622 (Michigan Court of Appeals) | 8/14/20 | |||||||||
| Davis v. Benson, No. 1:20-cv-00981 (MI Western District Court) | 10/14/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Daunt v. Benson, Case 1:20-cv-00522-RJJ-RSK (MI Western District Court) | 6/09/20 | VOTER | TBD | Michigan | Clean-up, purge voter rolls | TBD | TBD | 9/11/20 | Active | |
| Reed-Pratt v. Winfrey, No. 3:20-cv-12129 (MI Eastern District Court) | 8/08/20 | RULES | TBD | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail: Unsolicited mailing of absentee voter application | Dismissed as Legislation Pending | Trump/GOP | 10/27/20 | Active | |
| Reed-Pratt v. Winfrey, No. 20-1876 (6th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 9/10/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| RNC v. Weipert, No. 06521 CVCV081957 (Iowa District Court, Johnson County) | 8/10/20 | RULES | YES | Iowa | Vote-by-Mail (Signature Verification Standards; Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Other Vote-by-Mail Issue) | Corrective Action Ordered | Trump/GOP | 9/12/20 | Closed | |
| Moore v. Circosta, No. 4:20-cv-00182 (Eastern District of NC) | 8/10/20 | RULES | NO | North Carolina | Plaintiffs oppose relaxation of voting requirements due to COVID-19 | Dismissed – Lacked Standing & Laches | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/6/20 | Closed | |
| Moore v. Circosta, No. 20-02107 (4th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/15/20 | |||||||||
| Moore v. Circosta, No. 20A72 (US Supreme Court) | 10/22/20 | |||||||||
| RNC v. Gill, No. 03971 EQCV193154 (Iowa District Court, Woodbury County) | 8/14/20 | RULES | YES | Iowa | Prepopulating of mail-in ballots | Injunction Granted | Trump/GOP | 10/16/20 | Closed | |
| RNC v. Gill, No. 20-1169 (Iowa Supreme Court) | 8/15/20 | Stay Granted | ||||||||
| Election Integrity Fund v. Benson, No. 20-000169-MM (MI Court of Claims) | 8/24/20 | RULES | TBD | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail: Allowing online applications | TBD | TBD | 9/21/20 | Active | |
| Texas v. Hollins, No. 2020-52383 (TX District Court, Harris County) | 8/31/20 | RULES | YES | Texas | County Clerk sending mail-in ballots to all voters in the election. | Insufficient evidence of harm | GOP Defendant | 10/17/20 | Closed | |
| Texas v. Hollins, NO. 14-20-00627-CV (Texas Court of Appeals) | 9/14/20 | |||||||||
| Texas v. Hollins, Nos. 20-0715, 20-0729 (Texas Supreme Court) | 9/22/20 | Over turned and agreed w Plaintiff | ||||||||
| Election Integrity Project of NV v. NV, No. A-20-820510-C (NV Dist Ct, Clark Cnty) | 9/01/20 | RULES | NO | Nevada | New Nevada statute AB4 increased likelihood of voter fraud | Dismissed – Lacked Ripeness | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/18/20 | Closed | |
| Election Integrity Project of NV v. Nevada, No. 81847 (NV Superior Court) | 9/25/20 | |||||||||
| Martel v. Condos, No. 5:20-cv-00131 (District of Vermont) | 9/04/20 | RULES | NO | Vermont | Sec of State exceeded their authority | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 10/15/20 | Closed | |
| Lamm v. Bullock, No. 6:20-cv-00067 (District Court Montana) | 9/09/20 | RULES | TBD | Montana | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that the Governor exceeded his authority, etc.) | Insufficient Evidence | Election Administrators | 10/17/20 | Active | |
| Lamm v. Bullock, No. 20-35847 (9th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 9/30/20 | Appeal | ||||||||
| Lamm v. Bullock, No. 20-35847 (No. 20A61 (US Supreme Court) | 10/06/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Carson et al v. Simon, No. 0:20-cv-02030 (District Court Minnesota) | 9/22/20 | RULES | YES | Minnesota | Objected to State not enforcing Minnesota’s Election-Day ballot receipt deadline | Denied request | Trump/GOP | 11/5/20 | Closed | |
| Carson v. Simon, No. 20-3139 (8th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/20/20 | Granted: Reversed lower court | ||||||||
| Penn. Voters Alliance v. Centre County, No. 4:20-cv-01761 (M.D. PA) | 9/25/20 | RULES | TBD | Pennsylvania | Private Funding Encourages Illegal Ballots [At Supreme Court combined w similar lawsuits from other states: WI, MI, MN, IO, TX, GA, SC.] | Dismissed – Lacked Standing & Laches | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/13/20 | Active | |
| Penn. Voters Alliance v. Centre County, No. 20-3175 (3d Circuit Appeals) | 10/22/21 | |||||||||
| Penn. Voters Alliance v. Centre Cnty., No. 20-553 (US Supreme Court) | 10/26/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Wise v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections, No. 5:20-cv-00505 (E.D. NC) | 9/26/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | North Carolina | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution, etc.) | At US Supreme Court this case was consolidated with Moore v. Circosta | TBD | 12/6/20 | Consolidated | |
| Wise v. NC State Bd. of Elections, No. 20-2063 (4th Circuit Appeals) | 10/18/20 | Extension of voting deadlines | ||||||||
| Wise v. NC State Bd. of Elections, No. 20A71 (US Supreme Court) | 10/26/20 | |||||||||
| Republican Party of PA v. Boockvar, Et Al., 20A84 (US Supreme Court) | 9/28/20 | RULES | YES | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Mail Voting Deadlines [for Applying, Receiving, Postmark]) | Stay Granted | Trump/GOP | 11/6/20 | Closed | |
| Judicial Watch v Griswold, Case 1:20-cv-02992 (Colorado District Court) | 10/05/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Colorado | Bloated Voter Rolls | TBD | TBD | 1/14/21 | Active | |
| Arnett v. NC State Bd of Elections, No. 20 CVS 00570 (NC Sup Ct, Duplin Cnty) | 10/05/20 | PROCESS | TBD | North Carolina | Transparency in counting Absentee Ballots | TBD | TBD | 10/20/20 | Active | |
| Reed v. Virginia Dept. of Elections (Frederick Circuit Court) | 10/09/20 | RULES | YES | Virginia | Enforce statutes governing the acceptance of absentee ballots with respect to postmarks | Granted | GOP Defendant | 1/13/21 | Closed | |
| PILF v. Boockvar No. No. 1:20-cv-1905 (Middle District Court of PA) | 10/15/20 | VOTER | TBD | Pennsylvania | Clean-up, purge voter rolls, esp deceased | TBD | TBD | 10/19/20 | Active | |
| Bognet v. Boockvar, No. 3:20-cv-00215 (Western District Pennsylvania) | 10/22/20 | RULES | TBD | Pennsylvania | Illegal extension of voting deadline | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | TBD | 1/25/21 | Active | |
| Bognet v. Boockvar, No. 20-3214 (3rd Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/29/20 | |||||||||
| Bognet v. Boockvar 20-740 (US Supreme Court) | 11/20/20 | TBD | ||||||||
| Kraus v. Cegavske, No. 20 OC 00142 1B (Nev. Dist. Ct., Carson City) | 10/23/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | Nevada | Vote-by-Mail (Poll Observer Access; Signature Verification Standards; Notice/Cure for Mismatches Missing Signature or Mistakes) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | TBD | 11/10/20 | Active | |
| Kraus v. Cegavske, No. 82018 (Nev. Sup. Ct.) | 11/03/20 | Remand back to lower court | ||||||||
| Hotze v. Hollins (Supreme Court of Texas) | 10/27/20 | RULES | NO | Texas | Whether drive-through voting should be allowed | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Election Administrators | 12/17/20 | Closed | |
| Hotze v. Hollins No. 20-20574 (U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit) | 11/02/20 | |||||||||
| Nevada Republican Central Committee v. Clark County, No. A-20-8238210W (Nevada District Court, Clark County | 10/27/20 | MISC | YES | Nevada | Request for various voter data | Mostly Granted | Trump/GOP | 11/2/20 | Closed | |
| In re Enforcement of Election Laws and Securing Ballots Cast or Received After 7:00 P.M. on November 3, 2020, No. SPCV20-00982 (Georgia Superior Court) | 11/04/20 | PROCESS | YES | Georgia | Sequester ballots after election day | Denied – no evidence of law violations | Election Administrators | 11/19/20 | Closed | |
| Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (3rd Circuit Court) | 11/09/20 | PROCESS | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Multiple process deficiencies) | Insufficient Evidence | Election Administrators | 11/24/20 | Closed | |
| Costantino v. Detroit, No. 355443 (Michigan Court of Appeals) | 11/16/20 | Denied on statutory basis | ||||||||
| Costantino v. Detroit, No. 162245 (Michigan Supreme Court) | 11/17/20 | Dismissed – Moot | ||||||||
| Pirkle v. Wolf, No. 4:20-cv-02088-MWB (Middle District Pennsylvania) | 11/10/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NA | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Signature Verification Standards; Poll Observer Access) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/16/20 | Closed | |
| Bally v. Whitmer, No. 1:20-cv-1088 (Western District Michigan) | 11/11/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NA | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Observer Access) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 11/16/20 | Closed | |
| Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County B of E, No. GD-20-11654 (PA Common Pleas) | 11/12/20 | RULES & PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Vote-by-Mail (Failure to write name, address, and date on outer envelope, etc.) | Now at Supreme Court, consolidated with PA “Canvassing” cases above | TBD | 11/23/20 | Consolidated | |
| Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County B of E, No. 1162 CD 2020 (PA Common. Ct.) | 11/19/20 | |||||||||
| Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County B of E, No. 29 WAP 2020 (PA Supreme Court) | 11/20/20 | |||||||||
| Law v. Whitmer, No. 10 OC 00163 1B (Nev. Dist. Ct., Carson City) | 11/17/20 | MACHINE | NO | Nevada | Challenge to Voting Machinery / Hardware / Software: Accepting Invalid Signatures | Denied on statutory basis. (Discovery opposed and not granted.) | Election Administrators | 12/17/20 | Closed | |
| Law v. Whitmer, No. 82178 (Nev. Supreme Court) | 12/10/20 | |||||||||
| Kelly v. Pennsylvania, No. 620 MD 2020 (PA Commonwealth Court) | 11/21/20 | RULES & PROCESS | TBD | Pennsylvania | Legality of No Excuse Absentee voting | Injunction Granted | Trump/GOP | 1/21/21 | Active | |
| Kelly v. Pennsylvania, No. No. 68 MAP 2020 (PA Supreme Court) | 11/25/20 | Dismissed – Timeliness (Laches) | Election Administrators | |||||||
| Kelly v. Pennsylvania, No. 20A98 / 20-810 (US Supreme Court) | 12/03/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Kistner v. Simon No A20-1486 (Minnesota Supreme Court) | 11/24/20 | PROCESS | NO | Minnesota | Vote by Mail (Ballot harvesting; signature matching; etc.) | Dismissed – Timeliness (Laches) and Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/4/20 | Closed | |
| Bailey v. Antrim County (Antrim Michigan Circuit Court) | 11/25/20 | MACHINE | YES | Michigan | Voting machine improperly counted votes | Discovery Granted: TBD | TBD | 11/25/20 | Active | |
| Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 2020CV342959 (GA Superior Court, Fulton County) | 11/25/20 | RULES | NO | Georgia | GA should not have accepted a grant | Dismissed – Sovereign Immunity | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/7/20 | Closed | |
| Pearson v. Kemp, No. 1:20-cv-04809-TCB (GA Northern District) | 11/25/20 | MACHINE | NO | Georgia | Voting machine irregularities | Dismissed – Jurisdiction | Election Administrators | 1/19/21 | Closed | |
| Pearson v. Kemp, No. 20-14480 (11th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 11/25/20 | |||||||||
| In Re Pearson v. Kemp, No. 20-816 (US Supreme Court) | 12/03/20 | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | |||||||
| King v. Whitmer, No. 2:20-cv-13134 (Eastern District of Michigan) | 11/25/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Poll Observer Access; Ballots were Forged or Altered) | Dismissed – Timeliness (Laches) | Election Administrators | 1/12/21 | Active | |
| King v. Whitmer, No. 20-2205 (6th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 12/08/20 | |||||||||
| King v. Whitmer, No. 20-815 (US Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Johnson v. Benson, No. 162286 (Michigan Supreme Court) | 11/26/20 | PROCESS | NO | Michigan | Vote-by-Mail (Other Vote-by-Mail Issue) | Dismissed – Jurisdiction & Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/9/20 | Closed | |
| Mueller v. Jacobs, No. 2020AP1958-OA (Wisconsin Supreme Court) | 11/27/20 | RULES | NO | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Ballot drop boxes) | Dismissed – Moot | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/4/20 | Closed | |
| Hahn v. Simon, No. 14-CV-20-4033 (Clay County District Court) | 11/30/20 | PROCESS & VOTERS | TBD | Minnesota | Vote-by-Mail (e.g. Poll Observer Access). Voter Irregularities (Duplicate Votes, etc.) | Dismissed – Timeliness & Jurisdiction | Election Administrators | 1/13/21 | Active | |
| Hahn v. Keeler, No. A20-1654 (Minnesota Supreme Court) | 1/13/21 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. Superior Court, Maricopa County | 11/30/30 | PROCESS | TBD | Arizona | Vote-by-Mail (e.g. Poll Observer Access, Poll Observer Qualifications, etc.) | No proof of fraud | Election Administrators | 1/12/21 | Active | |
| Ward v. Jackson, No. CV-20-0343-AP/EL (Ariz. Supreme Court) | 12/04/20 | |||||||||
| Ward v. Jackson, No. 20-809 (US Supreme Court) | 12/11/20 | TBD | TBD | |||||||
| Braun v. Simon (NA) | 12/01/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Minnesota | Alleges statutory violations and irregularities in the post-election review process. | TBD | TBD | 12/13/20 | Active | |
| Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, No. 2:20-cv-1771 (E.D. Wis.) | 12/01/20 | RULES & PROCESS | NO | Wisconsin | Vote-by-Mail (Failure to Include ID Documentation) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing and Jurisdiction | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/9/20 | Closed | |
| Bowyer v. Ducey, No. 2:20-cv-02321-DJH (District Court of AZ) | 12/02/20 | RULES | NO | Arizona | Authority To Act (Elections Clause, etc.) | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/9/20 | Closed | |
| Burk v. Ducey, No. CV202001869 (AZ Superior Court, Pinal County) | 12/07/20 | MACHINE | NO | Arizona | Voting machine irregularities | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/6/21 | Closed | |
| Burk v. Ducey, No. CV-20-0349-AP/EL (Arizona Supreme Court) | 12/16/20 | |||||||||
| Texas v. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia (US Supreme Court) | 12/07/20 | RULES | NO | Various | Violations of State Election Laws | Dismissed – Lacked Standing | Case Not Fully Heard | 12/15/20 | Closed | |
| Still v. Raffensperger, No. 2020CV343711 (GA Superior Court, Fulton Cnty.) | 12/12/20 | RULES | NA | Georgia | Vote-by-Mail (Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution) | Voluntarily Dismissed (withdrawn) | Case Not Fully Heard | 1/7/21 | Closed | |
| Favorito v. Cooney, No. 2020CV343938 (GA Superior Ct, Fulton Cnty) | 12/28/20 | PROCESS | TBD | Georgia | Improper Ballot Counting | TBD | TBD | 12/28/20 | Active | |
| Decisions with Trump not Plaintiff Subtotals = | 48 | 10 | Note: GOP Plaintiff prevailed in 8 out of 10 cases decided on the merits | Trump not plaintiff: Active = | 18 | |||||
| Trump/GOP as Defendant: Case Name and Number |
Date Filed | Topic * | Decided on Merits ** | State | Issue(s) | Disposition | Ruling Favored | Date of Last Order | Status | |
| Washington v. Trump, No. 1:20-cv-03127 (Eastern District Washington) | 8/17/20 | MISC | YES | DC | Vote-by-Mail (several states vs USPS) | Injunction Granted | Plaintiff | 9/18/20 | Closed | |
| Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs, No. 2:20-cv-01903 (Arizona District Court) | 9/30/20 | RULES | YES | Arizona | Objection to State’s voter deadline | Supported on statutory grounds | Trump/GOP | 10/20/20 | Closed | |
| Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs, No. 20-16932 (9th Circuit Court of Appeals) | 10/13/20 | Overturned | ||||||||
| Pierson v. Stepien, No. 1:20-cv-09266 (Southern District NY) | 11/04/20 | PROCESS | YES | New York | Recount procedures | Defective claims | Trump/GOP | 11/13/20 | Closed | |
| Michigan Welfare Rights Organization v. Trump, No. 1:20-cv-03388 (D.D.C.) | 11/20/20 | RULES | TBD | DC | Trump trying to disenfranchise minorities | TBD | TBD | 12/26/20 | Active | |
| Decisions with Trump, et. al. as defendant = | 4 | 3 | Note: GOP Defendant prevailed in 2 out of 3 cases decided on the merits | Trump as defendant: Active = | 1 | |||||
| For All 2020 Presidential Election Cases | # of Decisions | Decided on Merits ** | Active Status | |||||||
| Grand Totals = | 80 | 21 | Note: Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 14 out of 21 cases decided on the merits | 25 | ||||||
| Main References: | *Main Topics are: a) Rules and Regulation legalities or interpretation (e.g. about absentee ballots); b) Process illegalities (officials correcting ballot errors, etc.); | |||||||||
| Stanford Healthy Elections Tracker | c) Voter Improprieties (e.g. non-citizens voting, non-registered citizens voting, deceased parties voting, registered voters voting twice, etc.) | |||||||||
| Scotusblog Election Litigation Tracker | and/or d) Voting Machine irregularities (e.g. an algorithm changing the actual results, etc.). | |||||||||
| Democracy Docket Election Lawsuits | ||||||||||
| Brennan Center for Justice | The Totals for each Primary Topic are: Rules = 47; Process = 32; Voter = 3; and Machine = 4. (The total is more than the number of cases, as some cases had more than one Topic.) | |||||||||
| Here is the Evidence | ||||||||||
| Public Interest Legal Foundation | **Decided on Merits means the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery. | |||||||||
| Wikipedia Pre-election 2020 Election Lawsuits | (For example, Discovery might entail an independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the claimed voting malfeasance, impropriety, etc.) | |||||||||
| Wikipedia Post-election 2020 Election Lawsuits | For the lawsuits that were voluntarily dismissed, we entered “NA” in the Merits column. For those cases still open, we entered “TBD”. | |||||||||
| Note 1: Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference). In each of these situations, the case was not fully heard. | ||||||||||
| Note 2: Disposition breakdown of the 80 lawsuits: Non-Merit = 23 (beige); To Be Determined (TBD: active) = 25 (white); Trump Statutory Win = 14 (green); Trump Statutory Loss = 7 (red); Voluntarily withdrawn (due to consolidation, etc.) = 11 (blue). | ||||||||||
| Note 3: Since several lawsuits were based on new election regulations (e.g. pertaining to absentee ballots), reportedly due to COVID-19 concerns, this is a list of such changes (by state): | here. | |||||||||
| Note 4: One of the several complexities in putting together such a list, is how to handle cases that are appealed. For example, should one case appealed twice be treated as three cases or one? | ||||||||||
| The argument for treating them as three cases is due to the facts that: the judges are different, the amount of evidence presented may be different, etc. In our initial versions of this list, we took this approach. | ||||||||||
| However, there are downsides to that treatment: it artificially inflates the appearance of actual cases litigated; do we indicate that this is one case open or three? etc. Although either way has merits, we are now counting such situations as one case. | ||||||||||
| Note 5: Another complexity is to sort through the multitude of cases filed having to do with 2020 election issues. E.g. the Stanford site (see above) lists 470± such cases (including appeals). We just selected those that directly applied to the Presidential contest. | ||||||||||
| That said, we make no claim that this is the entirety of 2020 Presidential election-related cases, but rather those that we were able to find from the several sources cited. If we missed any relevant cases, please send us an email and we will gladly do an update. | ||||||||||
| Note 6: Some other 2020 Election Reports by the same team of independent volunteer experts are: | here, | here, | & here. | |||||||
| For any questions, suggestions or improvements to this list — or to sign up for our popular, free Energy and Environmental Newsletter: | email physicist John Droz, jr. | |||||||||
See for Yourself the World of Clones & How You Can Tell the Difference! – Must See Video | Science and Technology | Before It’s News
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
The world of cloning really does exist. People actually believe that humans like Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and Tom Hanks are still alive without realizing that the future is now and that everything they are seeing is a lie.
Everything Wrong With the Capitol Shooting In 21 Minutes Or Less – YouTube
Trump Fires DEEP STATE Legal Team – Real Raw News
Source: Trump Fires DEEP STATE Legal Team – Real Raw News
Donald J. Trump on Saturday fired five attorneys from his impeachment legal team after learning they had ties to the Deep State, Real Raw News has learned. The shocking move comes only a week before Democrats hope to impeach him in Congress, a move that could stop Trump from seeking public office in the future.
Trump’s suspicions of foul play first arose after he overheard a fishy telephone conversation between lead attorney Butch Bowers and an unknown party. On it, Bowers reportedly uttered the words “tic tac doesn’t have a clue what we’re doing,” leading Trump to believe that “tic tac” was an unflattering reference to him. The call, while hardly concrete evidence of deception, prompted Trump to launch an investigation into the lawyers he had hired based on Rudy Giuliani’s recommendation.
When Trump asked the former New York City mayor if he had properly vetted the lawyers, Giuliani told Trump he had conducted a cursory background check but found nothing to suggest that the lawyers would betray their client. However, Giuliani admitted his research was limited to google searches and inquiries to state Bar authorities. Trump wasn’t satisfied.
“Trump’s been betrayed so many times, he trusts no one. He didn’t outright accuse Rudy, his longtime and loyal friend, of wrongdoing, but told him he was going to have someone else dig deep into the lawyers’ backgrounds, just in case he [Rudy] missed something,” said a Mar-a-Lago source familiar with the incident.
On Thursday, January 28, Trump tasked Dan Scavino, a principal loyalist and former White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications, with finding a link between the lawyers and the Deep State. What Giuliani failed to find in a week, Scavino found in a day, a wealth of data linking two of the five lawyers to primary parties seeking to impeach Trump in Congress.
Bowers’s business, Bowers Law Office, for example, had in 2019 contributed $2600 to Utah Senator Mitt Romney’s election campaign. Romney was an outspoken opponent of Trump and often advocated for his premature removal from office. Also linked to the Deep State was Deborah Barbier who, like Bowers, donated cash to Romney’s campaign. Worse, Barbier has working ties to CNN, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, media agencies that have attacked Trump relentlessly ever since he first announced his candidacy.
“Scavino stopped there. The assumption was since the lead attorneys were culpable, then the others probably were too. I understand that Trump met privately with each of them, but I’m not privy to what was said. All I know—all the world knows—is that they parted ways with Trump shortly after,” our source said.
In closing, RRN recognizes that our version of events deviates from a mainstream narrative claiming that the attorneys and Trump parted amicably over differences in defense strategies. We also acknowledge that it is atypical of Trump, a boisterous, flamboyant, and unfiltered man, to refrain from publicly bashing persons he considers traitorous. But sources we deem credible claim that Trump is now holding his cards close to his chest, as they say, and will soon play his ace in the hole.